THEY WEREN'T SIGNED
THAT WAS ANTONOPOULOS’ DREAD PIRATE ROBERTS’ DEFENSE THAT GOT KICKED OUT OF SILK ROAD PROSECUTION, SAYING TO SIGN YOU HAVE TO REGISTER A KEY, AND THAT HAS TO BE PROTECTED.
IF YOU THINK THAT, THEN YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND DIGITAL SIGNATURES AT ALL.
Other urls found in this thread:
groups.google.com
twitter.com
web.archive.org
youtube.com
twitter.com
gyazo.com
twitter.com
hurrr
>THEY WEREN'T SIGNED
>THAT WAS ANTONOPOULOS’ DREAD PIRATE ROBERTS’ DEFENSE THAT GOT KICKED OUT OF SILK ROAD PROSECUTION, SAYING TO SIGN YOU HAVE TO REGISTER A KEY, AND THAT HAS TO BE PROTECTED.
>IF YOU THINK THAT, THEN YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND DIGITAL SIGNATURES AT ALL.
THATS ***NOT*** cregslist
cregslist is rusty with staples and covfefe stains
I SAW IT MYSELF HES OBVIOUSLY SANTAAAA
>t. calvin 'tard enabler' ayre
wat?
Can somebody break this down and cut through the bullshit?
STIFF
>cucked beyond belief
imagine for a sec you could communicate with a dog and you explained this to him.......what would he think?
he'd see him for the hero he is. the world has a massive privilige imbalance problem. truly examplary behavior. there cannot be peace until all white males follow lead.
Yes.
I AM SATOSHI AND I NEED BTC FOR MY BUNGHOLE
it's ok, Craig. we all love you
Craig is saying that a Notary wasn't present, so the signed message is invalid.
Perhaps the earliest usage of 'stiff' (1996)
groups.google.com
Some old presentation from 2006:
web.archive.org
ouch. this one in the comments is hilarious too
the fuck is this thread even on about
>i remember reading this whitepaper back in 2008
>it had this section on how identity worked in bitcoin
>i remember reading it
WAIT SHIT who wrote whitepapers about bitcoin in 2008
>... probably... when I write it!
phew. saved
craig's brain during the performance. not him though, i think he's probably a legit schizo and somehow have actually made himself believe he is satoshi
always remember guys you can't crash no real market with imaginary corn!
plot twist: CSW sent the message himself. Why? to fuck with everyone that might think that BSV is an easy trade. (Calvin pump my fucking bags)
And to show that a legally valid signature is only valid if the identity is known. Until then it is just a "signed" message, but not a legally valid one.
Until the owner of those 150 addresses shows himself , the message is not legaly binding, CSW is very adamant on this regard. It is the driving a lambo when you find the keys on the countertop at the bar VS owning the lambo and showing papers analogy. One is a key, the other is ownership. Yes, the last ten years have shown everybody here in crypto that driving the lambo is the same as owning the lambo, but there is a small technical and legal diference.
Fuckface that signed that message hasn´t moved those coins. Whats more interesting is that the signer is still holding BSV and BCH. Why?
and 150 addresses at 50 BTC =7500 BTC, peanuts in comparison to the million bitcoins satoj still has.
oh
shut
the
fuck
up
before or after the dog got snipped?
Chart of BCH is at all time low. You can't find an easier stop loss than this with a potential 3x.
Bitmex adds BCHUSD on June 16th.
Their founder shills it. It's obvious it will pump huge to fill their trading desk shorts and then dump to oblivion. I sure will ride that rocket up. Will you?
twitter.com
sexiest fucking chart that exists - gyazo.com
>imagine being such a dumb redditnigger you can't recognize sarcasm
why do people care about any of this, he's a fraud get over it holy shit
gr8 b8 m8
Dave died
Nice just go straight to ad hominem. Very convincing. I will commend you for the absolutely breathtaking mental gymnastics you guys perform to defend your bags though. If you spent half that creativity on something productive, you might actually accomplish something in your life.
Amazing
Technically correct.