UBT will gain 100% against ETH in the next 2 weeks

Big news on the pipeline, 4 new major contract integrations to be announced at any moment + 1 big client will move 250,000 UBT (stay tuned to etherscan).

Also, a bonus: a new exchange listing (not the one you thinking)

UBT currently with a marketcap of $56M, will soon join the $100M club, and thats only the start.

So, any ETH laying around, you know the drill: UBT, wait 2 weeks, and double up baby!

Attached: unibright-1.png (800x800, 16.19K)

Proofs?

Nigga this shit is LITERALLY 50x in 8 months. Why would you even consider buying it until Q4 at the latest.

I say 50% more retrace, and I'm buying up more VRA.

No token needed:

CEO literally says its a 'voucher' for access.

Will be shut down by every serious government agency - FINMA, SEC etc etc

and DAN (Celium guy) is the biggest cunt in crypto.

>No token needed:
>CEO literally says its a 'voucher' for access.
Imagine being so retarded you actually write these two sentences right next to each other.
The token is needed to access the service. What about this do you find difficult to understand? Would it help if someone drew some pictures to explain it to you?

>The token is needed to access the service
KEK BASED RETAD

Attached: 1557513039881.jpg (270x187, 8.85K)

token not needed is cute fud since the regulators literally winked it through as one of the first tokens that have utility

Source?

>what is a utility token
Looks like you do actually need pictures before you will understand this. Go and read Unibright's homepage and think about it for five minutes. If you still don't get why the token is needed, ask and someone will explain it to you.

Whoever peddles the "token not needed" argument is a fucking out right spastic.

In order take advantage of bitcoins decentralised properties and security you need to buy bitcoin. Bitcoin is essentially a digital token.

In order to access the services of Unibright you need to buy UBT.

It's the whole fucking point of tokenisation or cryptocurrencies.

Some of you dumb fucks need to wake up and use youre uneducated, heathen like fucking brains and maybe, just maybe you will be able to put one step forward in life.

If you know you know

Attached: 1592215563160.png (1549x1207, 101.68K)

Its easily worth more on fundamentals alone lol. Look at shit that is priced 50x what it is... When stuff like BSV, BCH is in the top 10, then anything with a usecase could moon.

Are token peddlers in 2020 acually saying this lol?
Like 2017 never happend TOKEN NOT NEEDED its literally vid-t situation but backed by basline hype

Attached: 1571333064115.jpg (1182x754, 52.32K)

Token is literally a 'voucher' to access the framework.

So let me pose a Q to you brainlets:

As the chain uses eth for tx fees, why couldn't you charge your license fee in fiat?

You have the benefit of the blockchain via eth, so why need your own token for licenses?

NOBODY FROM UBT CAN ANSWER THIS Q

SCAMMY CASH GRAB ICO

Let me guess, you didn't buy at 5 cents.

Attached: Screen Shot 2020-05-18 at 5.58.57 pm.png (2760x764, 627.11K)

know what user ? isnt this the icnq wallet

Truth, because eth is going back to double digits

Could the chain work without the $UBT token?

Yes.

Therefore, token is worthless.

So you didn't make a 10x on UBT this year? Why not?

Yeah i think it's Iconics wallet.
Those are part of the 2 million they got for helping to start up UBT.

I got out at 5x

Not bad for something that is inherently worthless!

So you sold for a profit and now you're fudding? Trying to buy back in, or is your time just completely worthless?

It is going to top 10.

There is a big demand for baselining with Unibright, we are prioritizing demand in talks to several entities, from Germany to US, from tech to production, from startup to Fortune 100, from “ideas” to “please baseline my ERP”. Many of these requests include SAP integration, and here we can greatly play out or 20+ ys experience combined with our blockchain integration expertise. Our goal is to not only do “another PoC” (although PoCs are great!) but also build our framework tools around dedicated Baseline templates to support as many future customers as possible. We are working on some of the leads together with our latest partners from provide as well. We are happy to be part of ETH Atlanta conference on Thursday, where we also have a speaker slot (next to Kyle from Provide and John Wolpert).

Who ever tells the argument "no token needed" is either a retarded, or someone who clearly missed the boat in one of the most successful projects of all times.

No Token Needed ??? Ok, how do you use their service without their token ?? The all system is designed to use the token... no token, no service.

It's an utility token... want to utilise you have to get the token !!!

Thats the single worst argument I've ever heard... it's 50X in price in 8 Months? yes, more or less, but started from where? literally from fucking zero!!!!

What counts is the marketcap, which is currently $59M.... and it's heading to the hundred millions, because is what happens when you have a top notch service and all the big boy companies will be your clients.

Not soon, but for sure.

LINK2.0

Could the chain work without the $UBT token?

Yes.

Therefore, token is worthless.

>Could
>Yes.
>Therefore
brainlet

No, it can't work without UBT. Since it was built by design to use the UBT token... so it's not a "if", but it's a fact.

That argument is so stupid, basically you could apply it to all utility tokens... yes, in theory you dont need any tokens in any project, you could just use ETH... but the thing is, ETH was built with tokens and utility tokens in mind, and it makes a big part of ETH usage case, so it's irrelevant what you think.

You could say the exact same thing about LINK, LEND, RCN, LRC, BAND, etc etc etc and it would be absolutely irrelevant, since all those projects were built with an utility token by design, their platform wont work without it.

You have a problem, you dont understand jack shit about what a utility token is.

That was the literal point yes

Attached: 1592312375387.png (500x500, 34.59K)