What went wrong?

Attached: qvSHhRyC.jpg (512x512, 12.64K)

Other urls found in this thread:

blog.synthetix.io/update-on-xag-pricing-incident/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

I didn't buy enough

On a swing, need it back to 43 from 45 for another cheeky 50 stinkies

scam that's all

where do i start.

1) they used swift and other logos on their marketing misleading people to buy the token.
2) The team dumps 1million link on heads a month just like Ripple
3) The only usage is when the chainlink team makes a price feed contract and shoves it down a defi projects throat. Everyone that thinks chainlink has customers. Lets see how many customers stick around when they have to start charging.
4) you said what went wrong...what went wrong is you are still holding after it went from 30mil to 1.5 billion. The money has been made on link. There are better projects with a hell of a lot more upside.

Do you want me to continue?

Still need more

Yes, please do.

5) Chainlink claims to be decentralized yet team holds more than half the supply
6) Chainlink claims to be decentralized but runs every single chainlink oracle contract (what happens if chainlink forgets to fill up eth or link?)
7) Chainlink is all big on "oh were blockchain agnostic" meanwhile there is no other blockchains getting 1/10 the traction as Ethereum. Blockchain agnosticism is a meme.
8) The link token was supposed to be needed due to erc677 transfer and call. Not one customer is using transfer and calls as they are only pulling prices from reference contracts ran by centralized chainlink team.
9). It's been over a year since main net. The biggest customer is some dopey defi platforms. Yet sergey will use swift and facebook libra on slides.

Shall I continue?

Based. Keep going.

10.). Type in $link on twitter, you won't find a more cringe community. I keep seeing "we're so early" from soccer moms from Chattanooga. Meanwhile most OG link holders have moved on.
11.). If Chainlink is doing so well, ask any of the customers for the info on what they are paying to use chainlink. You will never get an answer because they are using for free. They have to pay by advertising they use and pay for chainlink.
12. Meanwhile none of the "sponsors" have to even hold the link token...so what's the point?
13. Speaking of link token many think they will get to stake their link, they won't. Staking may come to the pre-selected nodes but it won't mean much to the 99% of holders.
14. Speaking of 21 nodes, why only 21? There are 100+ more on chainlink node listing sites that still to this day don't have any usage. Meanwhile those operators are losing money in infrastructure costs...muh demand

Shall i go on?

memes descended into frenposting

frenposters do not make it

they have cursed LINK

death to frenposters

SERGAY BETRAY

no more then ok. Just imagine thinking you're early to a project that went from 30mil to 1.5 billion with nothing more than some price feeds ran by a centralized entity and given for free all while the token isn't even needed for this service. If you hold link today, good chance you werent holding early and you now have an OG's bags...congrats

fpbp

More

No more please I can’t take any more

sergey always having the same shirt should be enough

Nothing i earned alot. onto Sta i guess

Nothing went wrong, many people 20x'd their investments. You're just late to the party.

>youhavenoideahowbadthingsreallyare.jpg
The kicker is that, despite how shit Chainlink is, without it Ethereum would be a useless husk

compound and maker operate just fine without chainlink and both require oracles. Makes you think.

both of them are bending the knee tho

42 posting

Based

Once again, they are running just fine and using oracles without link. So would ethereum really be a "useless husk" without link? no.

Buy the dip

Maker did not run fine in March

it's not 1k USD yet

Maker literally got people life savings liquidated because of faulty oracles.

it ran better than chainlink did in February -
blog.synthetix.io/update-on-xag-pricing-incident/

Every Chainlink oracle is ran by the chainlink team. They select the nodes, pay the nodes link (don't know why, maybe to keep face), and pay the eth gas. If Chainlink messes up (they did with synthetix and forgot to fill up eth on heartbeats) and the oracles fail.

>$36,000 loss vs Maker $8.1M

kek I give you facts, and you spout this meme nonsense to me.

who the real schizo?

both are faulty oracles. Chainlink is centralized whether they pay 21 nodes or 200, Chainlink is the centralized point of failure

what's meme about what I just posted

>every chainlink oracle is ran by the team

I honestly can’t believe you faggots are still on with this whole Link thing. The world is fucking finished. I have a lot of link and been in since early 2018 and I don’t even give a shit anymore. I mean don’t get me wrong... it’s not like I don’t want it to go to $1,000 but who gives a shit at this point? It isn’t like your going to be able to have fun like early Bitcoin dudes who got rich did. I’m actually driving while writing this and just looked over and someone is wearing a mask in their car while driving. ITS FUCKING OVER.

The unironic hilarious part about this is I actually envy newfags who have gotten in in the past 4-8 months who might only have 3,000 link or less... they are pozzed they got in late but now it’s all fucked and the joke is on us OG link marines with 10’s of thousands of link.

Remember when a lot of us oldfag link marines were always saying this has to be too good to be true? Well it turns out it fucking was too good to be true. Because the world is unironically fucked.

The ONLY fucking possible salvation from all of this is if Chainlink ends up being so fucking valuable that you can trade a portion of your stack is to not get the inevitable vaccine, or to trade a portion of it to not be slaughtered by the Jews.

Link is only potentially about survival and not lamborghinis anymore.

They have shitty subhuman protocols and will bend the knee when we tell them to, but they can keep running their monopoly bullshit just fine on their own sure. Anything useful will require link, like not requiring trusting some trust fund retards with the overall smart contract security.

Seething nolinkers stay poor

Kek

Based

Attached: E53C5843-B89F-4C36-A8F4-4C1A94764A2C.jpg (819x1024, 155.71K)