Get some fud together

Can somebody please say why QNT is a shit investment based on real facts and not these shitty easter european fud attempts?
I'm thinking about buying in because I missed the LINK train due to being a brainlet. Ofc I'm accumulating now bit by bit but I also want to invest in a second moonshot project to increase my link stack.

So I'm nearly over the fence to buy quant after the recent dip. I researched qnt in the past days and I don't see how it is not a great opportunity:

> Solves actual problem
> Has working product (launch this month)
> 12 mio circulating supply (14 mio total). This is mega bullish, only 2 mio tokens are locked. An advantage I don't even see in link
> CEO has a known and trusted name
> Located in UK, no cayman islands
> CEO is working in the fintech industry for over 20 years, now he has a startup in the same space
> Partnerships with SIA (swift for europe), wepay uk, Oracle and counting
> CEO is founder of the ISO/TC307 blockchain standard (this is also dope)
> CEO hangs around with high profile people like EU politicians and the rockefellers
> Most recent employee worked over 10 years for vocalink and is now easily missing out on a 150k+ in salary at quant. Why?
> No crypto marketing yet. This is good. Read here why: medium.com/tellor/the-delusion-of-liquidity-ba7617d73226
> Quant aims to penetrate many sectors like finance, healthcare, supplychain... CEO answered that the growth is uncapped so far
> Full regulation with finma
> No Tier 1 exchange yet
> Market cap of Link in 2017

These is the stuff I had on my mind rn, maybe somebody can refute the project or add something to the
> list

Attached: OIP.LfdpPVWEzJA5nAiW8ZO5NAAAAA.jpg (400x400, 7.87K)

i've got a few FUD points

Attached: FUDsyourtoken.png (374x482, 454.75K)

Chainlink makes Quant obsolete.

In what way? E.g: QNT allows to run multi chain smart contract applications while the underlying asset is bitcoin. That's a new scope and nothing like link

Token not needed

When we compare Chainlink and Quant with REST.
Chainlink is GET only.
Quant is the whole REST stack, GET PUT POST etc..

>>Token not needed
It's not a cryptocurrency, it's an utility token.
Token as a license in this case. It enhances the software greatly.

In cryptocurrency you have these currency ecosystems, miners get paid in btc etc..

This is not the case with utility tokens, do some research about it.

Attached: gil lies.jpg (599x502, 109.47K)

Yes it is. The whole ecosystem is built around it. It's also THE incentive to keep the network running and secure.
Clients can use multichain applications and node hosters collect the fees. Clients need to use the overledger? Licence needs to be paid and the corresponding amount in qnt is locked for that time period.

Delete this, biz doesn't deserve QNT.
Btw Overledger for enterprises is live since 2018 and allowed them to test different blockchain technologies in a sandbox environment.
The launch of Overledger Network is something different.

UBT makes quant look like dog shit

The Quant token isnt actually used for anything other than buying a license. It has no technology. Its an API call like any CEX exchange

Gilberta Allah Scamian

QNT is real

UBT ceo calls it a voucher all the time kek

fuck off with that dogshit if it wasnt for Chico would be dead already

real dogshit

Fuck off Cobra.

Look you didn't provide anything to the discussion. I wouldn't even be mad if you'd have said why UBT is better. But you decided to stink up my thread, so fuck off!

It's also used to pay gateway holders. Private as well as enterprise grade. Just realized you are full of curry after seeing you post 3 times in a row. Fuck off

You can too, fuck off!

Jesus christ I wanted a normal discussion and got curry again

easter european fud attempts? are you a dirty unwashed jeet?

Nah I'm a mountain jew

No other token on oracle's fintech site

>Jesus christ I wanted a normal discussion
For whatever reason it's literally impossible to have a real conversation about Quant on here
You get the same few faggots that post:
Token not needed
UBT/Chainlink is better
Quant will die in 2020
Quant is a scam
Gil is a scam artist
Without ever actually backing up their position. Then you might get the faggot in the picture of this post fudding because he's a spaz
This coin causes Zig Forums to sperg out, whatever shitposting isn't caused by Zig Forums is caused by spilled over telegram drama. It's embarrassing. I haven't seen a real Quant thread on here in a year because people have given up trying to have them
This board is shit now

why would you back up your arguments when you can just make a plain statement and has the same psyhological effect ?

It's all so tiresome. Fuck these p&d tg jeets
Because I explicitly asked for that you nigger

>the same psyhological effect
To who though
This board has never cared about this coin, Quant threads have never really been active. This board has become increasingly unbearable over the past 2 years, there's not much reason to come here anymore when even the fud has no effort
Sorry user but Zig Forums isnt worth it anymore. You cant talk about coins on here unless it's link. Your only options are to go to the coins telegram or discord which are always just echo chambers

But I don't want to hang out in echo chambers, you can't really ask questions due to fuddsters. Back in 2017 we had the same pajeetery here but at least the fud was more creative.
I guess I'll buy a few quants before Q3 and if it somehow does a 5-10x the interest will be higher.

Do you know where one can discuss altcoins without pajeetery or trannies?

Attached: EEOlfvnT_400x400.jpg (333x333, 8.72K)

Also the other option would be to provide engaging quality content but that way one doesn't even get 1 (you)

I think all the anons that made this board worthwhile likely abandoned it and made their own chatrooms
There's not really any good places to talk about crypto anymore
I have a stack of 1000 quant, if it moons then great, if it doesnt then I'm not really mad

I had the exact same reasoning as you and after digging into it I decided to invest. I have created several threads about QNT in the past few months and every single one of them turned to shit (kind of like this one I suppose). I don't understand why biz hates this project so much. As always, there are no guarantees in life but the connections to the CEO and QNT are undeniable, will that necessarily result in adoption and moon? I don't know, but if QNT isn't a scam (which would mean Gilbert is a lying scammer which I don't believe is true based on everything I've researched) then QNT is on the level of LINK in terms of potential.
t. top 1000 LINK holder

Quant will die in 2020

1k qnt is expensive but doable. What's the suicide stack in your opinion? I often hear that it's 1k qnt but the link suicide stack only cost 3k while this one costs 6k. Qnt has a pre-moon link market cap rn so logically 500 qnt to make it?
Also do you think the Link oldfags left too? Feels a bit like it desu.
What do you hold additionally? What do you hedge qnt with?

Thanks for your insight, Top1000 holder is my goal too. No chance qnt is a real scam, oracle and SIA confirm this. That's why I'm asking for the not-so-obvious-and-invented red flags. And yeah I was thinking about why QNT is so irrelevant here and I guess it's because there is a tiny overlap with chainlink so many linkers feel probably attacked by these threads?

Kys