>Chainlink wasn’t initially number one choice

>Initially, Chainlink was not BSN’s number one choice, it was second on the list of potential oracalized data providers. However, he says that they were swayed by the strength of Chainlink’s community and team:

>“We looked at the top four, on the list, Chainlink was not number one. They were the second one. But we saw that Chainlink has the best community, best support. [...] Also, we really liked the team.”

>cointelegraph.com/news/chinas-blockchain-service-network-integrates-chainlink-oracles

What did chinks mean by this?

Attached: 1551395712871.jpg (1680x1680, 285.99K)

>best community, best support
wtf i love stinky chinky frens now

Attached: 1576822710214.jpg (1200x675, 107.36K)

If you would actually understand something about programming and smart contracts it doesn't take a genius to figure out that Chainlink's oracles, quite frankly, suck ass.

Band protocol is literally years ahead of Chainlink even though they started just now. Chainlink doesn't have the talent, it's basically just shiny ERC-token with transfer & call functions.

First they chose band because its a chink project but then they realised that its a copy paste scam building on the success of chainlink

>we couldn't have possibly been astroturfing support for this system we plan to implement inescapable global communism with; it wasn't our first choice!
>look how organic and grassroots the community is!
>did you know sergay nazarov is satoshi nakamoto?

Attached: 1526049810660.jpg (908x714, 249.1K)

Adelyn

kek, someone post that image where a band dev literally said to "get on copying Chainlinks VRF thing" in their github.

>Band protocol is literally years ahead of Chainlink even though they started just now.
That copypasta project where they openly admitted they just cloned LINK?

How unlike the Chinese to rip something off.

Linkies going to continue to ignore that its been 3 years and 30M and the product delivered is nothing described in the whitepaper.

In east Asian countries there is a lot of nationalism and pride for all things in made in that country. In a country like China regulators will first check to see if there is a home grown solution before picking something made by foreigners. In this case, like others have mentioned, band protocol exists, but it's obvious it is a clone and they have no idea what they're doing. To save face BSN probably said that Band was their first choice, but went with Link because (insert non-insulting reason against local solution here).

Having worked with Chinese businesses before I have seen it time, and time again.

This. Plus read up on Huawei and the African embassy. Chink tech was sending info back to China. There’s no way a Chinese, state endorsed solution would be trusted by the rest of the world.

Good point about Chinese based tech never being fully trusted by anyone other than the Chinese. I still can't believe the BSN announcement didn't pump it up to at least $7. Once people realize what smart contracts are, what they do, and what they're worth is when crypto will see the golden bull run. Unfortunately, I think we have to wait another few years before people realize it, and realize that LINK is going to lead it.

Band fucking thai, they’re still foreigners.

And Sergey isn't?

I’m just saying band wasn’t even on there radar, i don’t think there was a chinese oracle.

1000% this

Confucius protocol when?

BSN = Bitcoin Servey Nazarov

>>What did chinks mean by this?
Pic very much related

Attached: we did it biz.jpg (200x200, 20.54K)

I think the entire bsn thing might be a scam because the price didnt move at all why wouldnt the chinese want to buy up tokens if its as big as we think? It just doesnt add up. Is it illegal to buy tokens in china?

Attached: kekd.jpg (800x450, 40.38K)

>it's basically just shiny ERC-token with transfer & call functions.
>t. midwit that doesn't understand programming
It's so easy to spot you guys

It's pretty easy to guess who their first choice was

Attached: 1558006761860.png (1204x799, 48.95K)

China respects STRONG shit posting.

Is this image from 2018?

>From dOracles
>To nOracles
iExec already bent the knee

t. taobun

Attached: EZXDm1oWkAgpH_d.jpg (680x261, 27.73K)

dos network?

looooooool

Because it's true what they say.

There are plenty other oracle solutions out there that provides the same or even better services.

Attached: 1474940484349.gif (340x174, 1.73M)

Yup both makerDAO and Wave’s Gravity would outperform link

Hi guys, been working on a scam detecting UniSwap listing bot. Phase one is completed. Take a look and provide feedback if you like!

t.me/AllUniSwapListings

Attached: Capture.jpg (937x756, 103.35K)

They don’t even have tokens for their solutions lol
How can I even profit from this

Link had a shit token economics and did u forget how sergey dumped 700k link on us???

Also tokens on oracles just mean that if you have enough LINK --> you can just attack the oracles of unrelated projects and clients.

Slow and steady wins the race.

Attached: the oracle solution.jpg (745x481, 30.07K)

So basically LINK is an attack vector on other projects.

Like why do we even need a token for a glorified JSON parser? And if it's not a glorified JSON parser, why not bother with oracles without tokens like MakerDao's oracle (which is separate from MakerDao's token) and Gravity's Interoperability Oracles?

Redpill me on why sergay needs my money?