Stacking up on NANO. How much do I need to make it? I have 1,300. This is a small set of my portfolio (10%)...

Stacking up on NANO. How much do I need to make it? I have 1,300. This is a small set of my portfolio (10%). Do you Zig Forums Bros think 3k-5k NANO should be enough?

Attached: nano-2-768x384.jpg (768x384, 11.85K)

Other urls found in this thread:

reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/hfrj37/nano_foundation_dev_ama_on_discord_my_notes/
youtube.com/watch?v=gYKPsMBJbHQ
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

nano is a redditcoin that will only ever do anything again if picked up and shoved by bitcoin

>3k-5k
5k-10k probably
Nano probably end up in the $50-$100 range next bullrun.

If it went to around $40 last bull run I suspect $100 or over by the end of the upcoming bull run depending if we can crack the top 10 and not LTC out.

Maybe if it gets some adoption somehow, that's the risk you are taking.
Still think it could hit $10-$20 without any big news.

What does Fantom have to do with Nano?

Sorry.
Nano Foundation is broke within one or two months. Soon Bitgrail is over and millions of Nano will be dumped on the market, plus you will have a horde of early Nano adopters that really, really hate Nano after getting assraped by the dirty deal between Nano Foundation and swindler Espen Enger that totally protected NF after getting money and then run away with all the Bitgrail Victim fund.

>upcoming bullrun

Attached: 1563462620971.jpg (400x400, 27.25K)

I honestly don't think anyone cares about any of this stuff anymore. That was two and a half years ago now and the price is currently what like 97% from its ATH?

133 NANO = 21 BTC

wasn't some big news about Nano coming? What happened?

The core group that propelled Nano into top 20 CMC were hit during Bitgrail and Nano devs/Foundation just gave them the finger and took millions of dollars out of Bitgrail both before and after the hack. Reason why they don't say too much now, is that they will sell their nano and not crash the price. However, in a few months time they will be out of Bitgrail hell and say openly what they think about Colin, NF Espen Enger etc. Plus the dumping of millions of Nano by the Bitgrail trustee.

>133 NANO = 21 BTC
>130 OneCoin = 21 BTC

wasn't there supposed to be some big secret news coming out tomorrow?

Attached: 666.png (960x540, 349.64K)

They had an AMA
reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/hfrj37/nano_foundation_dev_ama_on_discord_my_notes/

>knock out litecoin
I cannot wait for the next bullrun to see how disappointed you guys get.

Attached: 12355467.jpg (155x121, 4K)

>I honestly don't think anyone cares about any of this stuff anymore
American Coinbase does not even bother to consider listing American developed Nano. Do you ever wonder why?

What is better than nano? Bitcoin and Monero will always be needed, but they are not fee-less.

Nano is only feeless because all costs for this supposed global currency is taken by volunteers. It only functions now because there is no load on the network and no one, including Nano Foundation has done any kind of cost analysis. I can make a feeless travel agency paid for by volunteers, if nobody is actually using the travel agency. Doesn't mean that the business model is retarded and dysfunctional.

Constellation is feeless with a much more advanced and smart cost model.

If it costs me a few hundred dollars per year to run a node but I save thousands on credit card fees there is direct incentive to do so.

Right now it is volentuuer based, but nano will become minable soon, making it fee-less and minable. This will give incentive to secure the network.

Mineable? Total and circulating supply is fixed. How will they do that? Fork?

>but nano will become minable soon
Do you have a source for that?

What if you can "save thousands of dollars in credit card fees" and also save hundreds of dollars by not running a node. Isn't that better? Do you know what the tragedy of the commons is? (spoiler:you don't)

>If it costs me a few hundred dollars per year to run a node
That's because you have no load on the network. Nano will never be able to handle 100 000 tps, the very minimum for a global payment network, they can hardly manage 10% of what they lied about years ago when they claimed 7000 tps. Pic. So what is the costs for IO, CPU and bandwith for 100 000 tps? Nano Foundation has no clue. They stay the hell away from any cost analysis.

Attached: 43243244.jpg (642x739, 127.48K)

So when Colin, Zack and the Italian scammers lied about Nano's tps, claiming 7000 tps right when BTC was fully clogged in Dec 2017, the reality was laughable 75 tps, pic. Nano Foundation has a long history of incompetence and dishonesty.

Attached: Nano 75 TPS Aug 2018.png (670x708, 103.96K)

Can anyone of you Nano fans explain why your Chief Operating Officer, pic, is a bikini blogger with no relevant business or tech education/background/contacts?

Attached: George Coxon - Chief Operating Officer - Nano Foundation 8.jpg (852x857, 158.55K)

And why Colin is such an ultra-liberal cuck? Pic.

Attached: Feminazi Colin.png (784x1359, 563.73K)

It's being worked on in private.

That's disgusting. So they tricked Nano retail investors into trusting Bitgrail, pic is dev Zack just days before the implosion, while Nano Foundation took out tens of millions of dollars before and after, while retail investors had their accounts frozen for weeks (months) and after the hack they refused to take free Nano from a burner address to compensate Bitgrail victims, many lost everything they had and several suicides are recorded. And now suddenly having a fixed supply is suddenly not so important anymore? Can these guys get any more slimy? Except for Espen Enger of course. Nobody beats him

Attached: Zack.Shapiro.BitGrail not a scam 4Feb.png (622x441, 74.63K)

Hottest bitch in crypto hands down, would inseminate.

The people who represent nano do not reflect the code being written. If not nano then maybe some other dag, but for now nano is the best dag there is.

Weird findom. Hope you enjoy paying for her private jet holidays. Pic is from her instagram account before it was made private

Attached: George Coxon - Chief Operating Officer - Nano Foundation 4.jpg (721x729, 83.61K)

This is also a risk everyone takes, when using a centralized exchange.

>The people who represent nano do not reflect the code being written.
See pic.
>but for now nano is the best dag there is.
No. youtube.com/watch?v=gYKPsMBJbHQ

Attached: 5234523325523.jpg (960x2117, 716.36K)