wait a minute,,,, if i rarrange her name Satoshi Nakatomo comes out
HOLY SHIET!
NAKAMOTO IS A WAMAN
James Howard
Or he is just using a woman as a face to create a solution....kind if trolling us....I see well played
Owen Stewart
That's one of the reasons bitcoin won't work as a currency (among a long list). When you have permanent deflation, why would you spend money? Investment will grind to a halt, and that's why a small amount of inflation is considered healthy. You want to incentivise people to invest in businesses that will generate them a return higher than inflation. It keeps money circulating and the economy going.
AnCaps are top brainlets. They don't know how capitalism works, and they stole their name from a long tradition of left-wing thought (while opposing true anarchists). Meme ideology.
Nicholas Kelly
first of all, you can already divide satoshis. they have done this on LN. everything that is digital is infinitlely divisable, well as much as your computer memory can handle/calculate
Crypto is the better money. no one will want to pay with it until their worse money is gone. so it will moon until it sucks up all the fiat on earth eventually.
I don’t think anybody is actually AnCap.. if they were, who cares they’re probably weirdos
Adam Reed
Bitcoin is just like gold. A somewhat limited ressource with next to no objective value. It just so happened that all the "bad guys" stick to the convention, that if you trade drugs for BTC you can trade the BTC for dollars afterwards. So the only "value" that BTC has, is that it is less traceable than dollars. Once the convention is overthrown, BTC becomes worthless.
tl;dr BTC is just a surrogate for $$$
Nathan Peterson
wrong. I had bitcoin since 2009 and have been using it to pay for things like many other people.
The whole deflation argument is stupid, think about it.
Computers/phones with certain specs, will always go down in dollar price in the future, that is, the dollar will always appreciate relative to computers. So, logically, people should never buy computers/phones/cars or any depreciating assets since they can get more for their dollars tomorrow.
Low iq take.
Jonathan Morales
>So, logically, people should never buy computers/phones/cars or any depreciating assets since they can get more for their dollars tomorrow.
And that is why I paid like 100$ in the last 5 years for any electronic device. Desktop PC - got it for 20$ from a friend. Not top nodge but decent. Phone? I get them for free from relatives and friends that bought a new one and dont know what to do with the old device.
Jeremiah Morris
RLC , IT'S NOT OVER
Cameron Clark
>Personal anecdote > centuries of macro economic theory and empirical evidence There's nothing more endearing than a retard who thinks he's smart.
Benjamin Ramirez
>personal anectode
are you implying that the computer industry, phone industry, car industry, luxury goods industry and so on should be worth zero? Because according to your idiocy no one would ever exchange something that will be worth more tomorrow for something that will be worth less tomorrow. The fact that those industries exist and have huge non-zero revenues, is a proof (non-anecdotal) that the op is wrong
Luis Phillips
What percentage increase in bitcoins value would prevent people from spending it?
Lots of countrys have banks with 10-20% interest rate, US had it briefly in 80s and spending doesnt stop.
Isaiah Sanders
This is not about your Xbox kid, this is about large scale institutional investment. A lot of new companies would not exist because, in order to raise capital, they would have to promise and deliver more than the normal risk + whatever return investors could get just by hoarding the currency. The economy would get severely impacted, since no new jobs are created. Do you think governments try to maintain a small but positive inflation rate just to annoy you? There's tons of data for why this is a good idea.
Anthony Gomez
checked and kekked
stop posting brainlet
Camden Moore
tbf inflation is normally pretty high when interest rates are that high
Levi Jones
>When you have permanent deflation there is inflation until 2140 brainlet
Seems pretty simple when looking at it longterm. Fiat only has value, because there is a network of nations using fiat. Aside from that, its simply an idea which is based on convenience. BTC is growing a massive international network and real world use cases. It also, unlike fiat, grows in value rather than lessens in value making it the preferable store of wealth. I cannot see how it will not take over as primary currency eventually.
Grayson Rivera
>a small amount of inflation is considered healthy. You want to incentivize people to invest in businesses that will generate them a return higher than inflation parasite. inflation is a silent tax on middle class wealth. In a deflationary environment where the value of your savings grows steadily, you will only invest in (or buy) something if it will being you more value than holding your stack will. This incentivizes stable growth & investment in only the best investments, not highly speculative stocks of companies than have negative revenue etc. the global economy has been like this for the past 6000 years (gold as a unit of measuring wealth), fiat currency is only 50 years old - an infant experiment. Bitcoin fixes gold's limitations and saves ordinary families from the likes of you & other scam economists with an inflation target.
Bitcoin is facing a huge uphill battle towards becoming an accepted currency in the way OP is describing. Read the article "The Political Economy of Bitcoin"
Isaiah Jenkins
LOL
Jonathan Jenkins
Kek I even moved on user, go to ARPA there's a few of us moving there