Well?

Well?

Attached: 1520862767820.png (960x720, 226.28K)

A, shes the only kid who can prove the flute doesnt play

whoever can pay the most for it so I can buy more link

A or B. C is typically a nigger

child b deserves the flute but a child making a flute doesn't fucking correlate to a business owner and its labourers

I'm taking the flute and walking away with it for myself. The fuck are these three children going to do about it.

a or b whoever lets me devour that cunny first

none. music is a jewish co-opted concept and needs to be purged from society. the children should all be systematically executed or put into forced labor by their ability to be re-educated.

the correct answer

B. she can sell a (((usage license))) to A if she wants to play the flute so much.

B, obviously. She made it and payed the expenses. Child A can buy it from Child B if she wants to use it. If it doesn't work properly then she can beat the shit out of Child B.

This. C is not worth considering.

I would tell A and C to shut the fuck up and learn how to make flutes from B. Then I would file for a patent of the design in my name. Now that production is scaled with B and C at work I'd take A to bookstores, schools, and music trade shows to showcase the flutes while B and C kept up with production. Once I secure a lucrative contract with Yamaha I'd fire A, B, and C and outsource the flute making to kids in Vietnam for a bowl of rice a day.

I'm split between A and B. Fuck C.

Attached: mo.jpg (960x720, 155.63K)

this

kek'd

Attached: 1558328352454.jpg (524x512, 95.35K)

B is the rightful owner of the flute. In the context of three kids fighting over it, I would try to convince B to share with A, on the condition that A plays music for the three of them to enjoy.

Turn around and fuck my ass with it

This. I am stronger than these children so I get the flute.

A is the moral/practical/utilitarian answer and B is the rational "technically she's right" answer

None of them. They’re all white devil children that Stole local native land and agricultural products to begin with and now provide a false narrative to support their racist imperialist ideology.

Child C: Giving me the flute, which I can't play, will improve my life immensely.

How? Is Child C going to sell it?

Attached: 1486895965684.gif (619x619, 1.83M)

if it doesnt play its not a flute, B is a filthy lying scam artist

B obviously, what kind of a retard test is this

The right answer is obviously have Child B teach Children A and C how to make themselves flutes. Then once they are all made Child A can teach them to play them. Child C gets to be a part of the fun as well because it isn't fun excluding friends or being excluded.

C, because fuck roasties.

But as far as we know, the flute works. Child B can't play the flute. I don't even know why the idea of a "broken flute" was brought up in the first place

Attached: 1581197473099.jpg (460x443, 33.11K)

just have B make 3 of them

B, then she should sell it to A.

Why is this my decision? Did I purchase or find the flute? If so then fuck all of them the flute is mine, they can play my skin flute if they want