ACID TOKEN (200ug)

Yea more divs if they dump. This is a cycle that is rewarding HOLDERS.

Bullish.

Attached: 301DBA8E-B71B-4BC4-9E3C-4B509FF519EA.jpg (900x900, 144.83K)

>t. never learned how exponential functions work
okay anons, have fun

because only retards buy into coins with zero usecase, team, or whitepaper.

Are you two actually dense or?

Almost every coin has zero usecases, we are just here to make money so we don't have to work you fuck.

This. What the fuck does hex do besides call themselves a certificate of deposit on the blockchain?

you are buying a useless clone token called "acid" lmao
right but at least they have the courtesy to pretend their coin has value rather than admitting it is worthless right from the get go

Hex is a scam you retard, Richard Heart is a literal scam artist who had been talking about making a coin so he can get rich for years before hex dropped

Whales will dump but the cycle will repeat. Holders will earn divs from the dumps, accumulate dips, and become the new whales. This has already been proven in practice with smaller sample sizes. Only weak hands will get burnt. As another user put it, it can become and infinite money loop if exploited properly.

On another note I agree there are too many threads on this right now. The community is super active so that's why. Bullish though.

Clone of? Enlighten me user. As far as I’m aware no other coin has 2% fees going straight into the pool of dropped (staked) acid

A scam that reached $1B market cap? You’re proving my point user...

this is akin to advocating alchemy or perpetual motion. you are a literal fool if you believe this. take an econ course
there have been dozens of these style of staking coins over the last few months, how new are you?

Oh my sweet summer user, wait till you learn about how much Enron was worth

I can't imagine ever buying an investment named "acid token"
But I'm not a tween that thinks acid is cool and I actually have actual money in securities so that's probably why

In b4 "ok boomer"

It's not perpetual motion when the mcap goes up from trade volume. Not everyone is going to win either. No one is advocating that this is a long term investment that everyone should buy and just hold forever. It's a machine. Use it for your benefit or don't.

this

>It's not perpetual motion when the mcap goes up from trade volume infinitely
yes it is

It doesn't need to go up infinitely. By definition it's not perpetual motion if trading provides fuel for the market cap gains and fluctuations. You could apply that "argument" against literally any token in the trade space.

the user I replied to used the words "infinite money loop"

"infinite money loop" doesn't imply infinite market cap. The potential loop comes from the staking system, which is fueled by trading, up or down. It will probably work something like generational wealth transfers.

Here's an example:
>A whale get's in at $0.10
>Stakes and compounds or sells divs until $0.30
>Dumps and price drops as low as $0.18
>12% of that dump goes back to existing stakers
>They accumulate the dip and new buyers get in, price begins to correct itself
>Wealth is ultimately transferred and a new generation of whales begins
>All of this is fueled by trading volume so it's not perpetual motion

Even if the ultimate ath eventually maxes out at $1-$2, the cycle of wealth transfer will begin at each ath, because it's unprofitable to hold if trading has stopped. After the dump, 12% of redistribution will occur automatically and the rest will come from people picking up the dip. It should work as long as the community doesn't fuck it up and try to collectively hold it into the ground, or all panic sell when a bigger dump comes.

So it can be an infinite money loop but not for any one generation of holders. It's a train that you get on to collect your divs then get off when you've maximized your profit so others can board.

>All of this is fueled by trading volume so it's not perpetual motion
holy shit are you guys actually on acod right now?

How much more clearly do I need to explain it? I haven't seen an actual argument from you.

I've studied economics long enough to know an "infinite money loop" doesn't exist