Did allowing women into the workforce stagnate wages?

Have sex incel

married with kids kike. try again... must make you seethe huh? and guess what? My wife doesn't work, even though we aren't rich

off yourself kike, he's right

A lot of that is pure speculation but ok user

>obviously yes, labor is subject to the laws of supply/demand like many other things.
This.
Also the fact that women are less likely to form real alliances like bros do. Basically, if the boss was acting like a fuck head to a bunch of women, they would all either work harder, or suck his dick harder to make him happy. If he did that to bros they'd be more likely to form a union and an alliance and agree they would only work a certain amount of hours.

no it isn't, what do you think happens to the price of labor when you flood the labor market with fucking labor. Have you been to silicon valley any time lately? I visited paypal, google, facebook etc last year and all of the lower level and mid level tech positions were pajeets and the positions lower than those like kitchen workers, janitors, general labor were all Mexicans, like 100%

What's with all the kikes flooding biz lately ffs

>what do you think happens to the price of labor when you flood the labor market with fucking labor
Except women didn't join the workforce overnight

No boomers allowing globalism/free trade and destroying unions have stagnated wages.

>Except women didn't join the workforce overnight
so what? likely it came in waves and when you combine women + turd world shitskins it's a massive increase in the labor pool compared to if it were primarily white men. Plus you have the nigger tax with shitskins and women getting into positions not based on output or productivity (spoiler alert they're shitty workers relative to white males) but based on being women and niggers, alone. So not only do you have an increase in labor you have an increase in labor that is less productive and a decrease in white males being promoted to key positions that matter

Attached: Screen Shot 2020-07-05 at 2.37.40 AM.png (1654x762, 879.07K)

that too, it's all connected and funneled into one giant fuck you to white families

Not necessarily in the long term. In the short term, yes. There are more workers going after the same amount of jobs. In the long run lower production prices can spur innovation and lower prices more than wages fell. There isn't a way to actually know that. Keep in mind the goal of economics is to maximize societal and personal well being, not wages. Even if they stayed at home, women would be making economic contributions to society, even though it isn't reflected in gdp so you have to rely on the assumption that women and families do a halfway decent job of calculating opportunity costs.

Of course women work today largely because housing is too expensive because of printing and because of memes from college

>Keep in mind the goal of economics is to maximize societal and personal well being, not wages
kek. imagine

Short answer. Yes. Increased supply of labor lowers the prices of labor as long as labor demand remains constant. This Econ 101. There are numerous other factors at play in our current situation, but on a basic level.. “yes”. Study basic supply and demand curves and you’ll considerably boost your macro economic knowledge. You don’t have to go to college for that shit like I did....

Stop blaming women. It’s fucking free trade and union busting that has destroyed wages for Americans. Tariff the shit out of every import and you can get rid of taxes on the middle class, industry will come back, Germany, China, and the rest of the third world will be destroyed and suck America’s dick for 1000 years.

If Rockerfellers (or anyone for that matter know this.

>be rockefellers
>know you are going to take us off gold standard soon
>know the resulting inflation and loss of purchasing power will destroy most families
>only way out is to convince both parents to work shitty jobs so 2 incomes needed

Then why would they need to do this?

>fund "women rights movement" and convince women that they are being stronk if they go work in a cubicle and never have kids

If families need women to work to make enough money to get by, it will happen regardless of feminism existing or not.

>If families need women to work to make enough money to get by
families never "need" women to go work, especially not for goldberg.inc....

families need women. period. full stop. end of story. no women no family in the real sense of what a family is.

The point is that feminism (a retarded ideology on it's face to begin with) was used for purposes that do not benefit women or families but mostly benefit a relatively small cohort of people a the the top at the expense of families at large

>Stop blaming women
nobody is blaming women, men are to blame for allowing women out of the house and going along with this insanity

The fallacy you are making is it's like buying a crypto currency for a service where that currency is not needed to use it. Feminism is not needed to do this, therefore any effort to support feminism for this purpose is a waste of money.

Feminism is the COMP of ideologies.

>Feminism is not needed to do this
to do what? you mean decrease labor price? there are many ways in which labor markets are fucked with and feminism helps in that, on thing of many. Decreasing labor costs for rich people is not feminism sole purpose. Feminism purpose is multilayered (destroy the family is another purpose), all of it dysfunctional and immoral, that is certain

or were you not referring to decreasing labor costs?

Dude, women work full time because they have to in today's climate. Your putting cause before effect. If women fully rejected feminism and went full trad-wives, they would still be working full time because if they didn't work the mens wages wouldn't be that much higher. How much do minimum wage jobs pay? Since the 2008 crash the vast majority of jobs created were minimum wage jobs (thanks Obama) and before jobs were shipped overseas (thanks Obama) you think people cared that women could work if they wanted to?

This whole blaming feminism thing for this particular issue strikes me as a huge fucking distraction more than anything. Where have the good paying jobs gone, that's what we should be thinking about. Actual useful conversations, if men can earn a decent living with their jobs there would be far more opportunity for women to be traditional housewives and mothers.

Yeah, and when workforce is flooded with H1B, the pay skyrockets. Fuck HBR