Yup, we definitely gucci.
We gucci?
my nigga we up
>2060
>fourth industrial revolution has happened
>all work is obsolete
>social mobility is over, it's impossible for a human mind or body to do anything of value to get an asset from another human.
>all authority, law and ownership is cryptographically and autonomously enforced through faceless DAOs who operate on the real world through Chainlink oracles
>all assets are tokenized and tracked on CoinGecko now
>DMG is the number 2 asset in the world, behind chainlink
>all assets in the planet are managed optimally by DMM through a sophisticated oracle chain that spans the globe with millions of DMMA's for every asset and risk profile imaginable.
>literally the one world bank that owns everything
>everyone is a slave of its predatory loans
>17 trillion market
>governed by 250 million tokens
>each token has to cost at least $136k just to avoid a hostile 50% takeover of assets
>each DMG pays thousands of dollars in yearly dividends
>in a dystopian metropolis, a wizened old man living in a flying helicopter mansion looks through the window
>he remembers the fateful day he bought 1k DMG because of a "suicide stack" meme posted by a wizard frog on an old community from that old decrepit network protocol nobody uses anymore. He doesn't even remember what is was called.
>he made it, but was this a world worth living in?
A lot of top LINK wallets accumulated DMG.
I'm literally shaking right now. You reckon we're gonna blast past $10 straight to $30?
I regret not buying more at .40. that's the way of it I guess.
Be happy you got a chance to buy at 0.40. There's a lot of people who couldn't buy below $1
Could this hit $10/DMG?
There is never going to be 250 million tokens in circulation. Tokens will be burned before then, lowering the supply.
Yes, but patience will be required, unless this thing really takes off and Coinbase hurries to list it due to the demand.
Long term: Definitely,
Short term: Easy $3-$5
Only 33million tokens will be in circulation for now.
we gucci
What is DMM
Gucci is Curio, not DMM.
curio will probably use dmm. curio ceo joined the dmm telegram
top kek
>Comparing used car CIA glowniggers to the 4IR
$3 waiting room.
I’m a big fan of DMM, got a bag myself, but you have to stop posting it with the Chainlink logo. Shitcoins do that. Basically screams “look at me I’m relevant because I use Chainlink”. We know that’s not the case with DMM, but just not a good look when you have to endlessly shill it next to the logo of an established legitimate project. I’m aware that DMM is reliant on LINK and it’s a critical pillar of the project, but DMM should be past this stage
Fkoff dmg gonna leave chainlink on the dust.
All pajeets gonna cry and wipe their ass with bare hands when this shit flies to $10 and then $100 per coin.
Except it’s literally reliant on Chainlink. How new to crypto are you? What’s poverty like?
As soon as it lists on a big stex its blowing past $10. Going straight to Comp's mcap level imo.
Post proof
not really, it functions well enough without chainlink....it just lacks transparency.
Room temp IQ user here. Congrats on this, seriously kek.
how so? the actual defi product functions without oracles retard, it's already functioning. its useable today. if you want to see where money is going outside the contract, you will need an oracle....but that's not functioning yet.
I got the clunkers in the back
Lien is attached
Account is in the black
Got the dick that's black to match
Ridin' on a whore, ha
Collateral on your Porsche
I been in the valley
You ain't been up off that porch, now
You answered your own question dumbfuck. How can one claim to be decentralized finance when the entire fiat to loan administration process is centralized off chain. Did you watch the AMA retard? Twice they quoted the need for Chainlink oracles in order to truly be considered “DeFi”.
when you say it's literally reliant on chainlink, I say no, it's not...but oracles are necessary to bring greater transparency.
its not decentralized finance today, I never said it was. chainlink wasn't an oracle in 2017 either....projects take time to grow.
....faggot
Gucci $$
When the own devs say they are reliant on it, I take it as reliance kek. If you want to beat around technicalities go for it, the fact of the matter is DMM needs Chainlink. There’s nothing revolutionary about an on chain DAO that votes on off chain centralized activities. Like I said, did you watch the fucking AMA? The devs themselves were talking about this kek
Chainlink will play a big role in this project. Those in DeFi demand transparency and doing that with real world assets while also taking Crypto lending and converting it to Fiat is a huge obstacle to overcome. Sergey will lead the way.
if this problem can be solved and be as transparent as possible, this project will be huge. The value of real world assets triumphs any value currently in the blockchain. If this value carries over into ethereum (blockchain), it will be bigger than anything we currently have locked up even after COMP going bananas.
DMM is in a good hands with a team like Chainlink.
why don't you ask your dad? oh shit you don't know who your dad is, since your mom slept with all the pajeets in india
In other words,
WE GUCCI
>on the dust
Ask me how I know you are both foreign and poor.
I'm autistic enough to split hairs with you. I know this project, I know that they talk about oracles and chainlink specifically. chainlink isn't the only oracle though and oracles aren't required for their existing smart contracts to function. buy more link if you want, buy dmg, both are good ideas.
>buy more link if you want, buy dmg, both are good ideas.
This. The only two projects I care about in the space right now
Apparently not autistic enough to recognize other oracles are non viable. BAND? Outdated price feeds with no staking penalty. TRB? 0 pull requests in over 9 months of being live. Chainlink is much more than an oracle, it’s a network of tamperproof inputs and outputs. Other projects don’t offer this, hence why you don’t see their name next to the things LINK is next to. “Oracles aren’t required for existing smart contracts to function” umm if they wish to make it past tokenization they will need to be reliant on an oracle mechanism. Genuine question, are you new to crypto? These are pretty well known facts user...
Guys forgive a brainlet. What is the difference between a bank and a DAO, in this case DMM? Isn’t it almost the same?
DMG holders can be compared to shareholders in a bank, and in this case DMG is now the middleman that a bank once was.