Reminder . There are over 10,000 wallets with more than 10,000 links. 10,000 is definitely not a making it stack, not even a suicide stack. What do you think the odds are that 10,000 people will make $10,000,000 each? That would require $100 billion in liquidity. You are delusional if you think this will ever happen. A suicide stack is 100,000 links. Make it stack is 1 million links. This is the truth. If you are holding a sub 100,000 stack hoping to make it, you need to wake up to yourself. Sell and buy a low cap moon mission, it's your only hope.
Reminder
Adam Walker
Elijah Adams
Ok
Carter Ross
> What do you think the odds are that 10,000 people will make $10,000,000 each?
1:1
Brandon Ross
You sound like someone who is suffering from a bleeding short position. Hope it hurts.
Michael Ortiz
ethplorer.io confirms
you're fucked nulinkers
Camden Myers
its so funny this is the only fud you have left, but hey i give credit for still trying!
Ian Long
>one person can only have one wallet
wrong
Henry Cooper
>That would require $100 billion in liquidity. You are delusional if you think this will ever happen.
>$100 billion
>being put somewhere
IMPOSSIBLE, INCONCEIVABLE, HOW COULD MONEY EVER BE IN ONE SPOT THEN IN ANOTHER THE NEXT MOMENT?
Jacob Rivera
Every time stuff like this gets posted, I take a step back and remember your claims a million LINK cost 110K, 100K link cost $11K assuming ICO price, For a speculative asset to cost that much than it means LINK is shit because a guy who put $5k into uber seed fund made it out with $26M and uber doesn’t turn a profit and LINK is a centerpiece in the fourth IR.
Isaac Bailey
I only have 300K Link which is nowhere near enough to actually make it.
All these Linklets with 10k stacks singing about 1k eoy are starting to piss me off with their propaganda. It was a joke and they are actually believing it and causing FOMO in newfags preventing the dump.Link is only going to $10 max. Right now I might make 1MM before tax on that, but tax will take a big chunk out of that then inflation will fucking ruin me over the next decade.
Even if I chuck the 1MM into a dividend stock that pays out well and I get 70k a year of it, it's not enough to beat inflation unless I basically live in poverty as a neet and keep my wagecuck job in the meantime so I don't have to sell any retirement Link. In 10 years that 70k a year will feel like 20k a year. You need a minimum of 2MM, but more likely 3MM to make it. The upper predictions for Link where about $60 but that was made during the bullrun of last year, and it assumed that the overall crypto market cap would still be expanding and BTC would go on to 1MM a Bitcoin and that we would be in a full blown crypto FOMO hype bubble when mainnet came out and we got our price singularity. All of that isn't going to happen anymore.
The singularity is cancelled. Now we will have a slow growth to $10. And the sad but ironic thing is most people on this board will hold from 20 cents, to $10 and then hold all the way back to sub $1 again because you all believe the 1k eoy memes, and just like the retards who held BTC and didn't sell at 19k, you will do the same with Link at $10. Looking at the current charts depresses the fuck out of me when I know I only have 100k Link, nowhere near enough to make it.
At best I will have 1-2 sweet years, and then return to wagecucking after that. But it will be worse because I will have tasted freedom and know what I am missing out on.
Juan Torres
there are about 3k wallets with 10k or more faggot
Lincoln Taylor
Didn't read.
Not selling.
My linkies stay super stinky, $1000 eoy.
Hunter Diaz
Wow you are actually retarded as fuck.
You think your equities will inverse against your dividend payouts against inflation? You actually think a divvy paying stock from 1990 is still paying the same amount?
Either you’re a complete idiot or a Pathological liar. Probably both.
Ethan Scott
Nicholas Carter
it'll have trillions in liquidity my dude
Ryan Murphy
>I only have 300K Link
Kek
David Sanchez
>10k wallets with 10k LINK
This is not true and OP is an idiot
Aaron Powell
ngmi
Connor Foster
this
and even if it was 10k not every one of those will hold indefinitely and even if they did what the fuck is 10k new millionaires. Like that's some huge number? There are 46 million millionaires in the world already
Nicholas Phillips
There are over 10000 people with houses. Try making sense.
Jackson Lopez
post wallet with tx
Aaron Cook
And ethereum has a similar wallet ratio before it’s massive rally. Your point?
Aaron Williams
nah get fucked
t. 550 linklet
Aiden Martin
>a project that is going to change the entire world can’t possibly make 0.000128% of the population stinky rich
Michael Powell
If someone posts something this completely retarded is it even considered fud.
Angel Campbell
>LINK is shit
no
Dominic Thompson
It should worry you even more that these are the kind of 'people' who 'invest' in link
Elijah Sullivan
lol this made me laugh
Alexander Gray
I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.
Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. Zig Forums hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.
'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.
The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons.
Brayden Rivera
pretty based. imagine if neets could get those kind of gainzzzz
Jonathan Martinez
100,000 LINK equivalent to 21,000 BTC.
So let's say 10k LINK = 2,100 BTC and 1k LINK = 210 BTC.
210 BTC at $20k recent top = $4,200,000.
Even 1k linklets will make it.