Whoa is that true?

American girls expect you to be circumcised though, it's weird if you're not.

Your first sexual experience was somebody using a knife on you?

It's true that you barely feel shit but only an asshole would take out the condom without permission.

>It's true that you barely feel shit
is it really that bad?
uncut bellend actually hurts pretty easily

Fingers are more sensitive than dicks, it's just not an erogenous sensitivity.

>Fingers are more sensitive than dicks
HAHAHAHA
no

Try giving your finger a small paper cut and then try the same with your dick and you'll see what I mean.

could have said you're cut
bitch I could learn to read braile with my tip three times faster than with my fingertips
that shit is annoying
it's TOO fucking sensitive

Don't do that, it makes mustard gas.

I feel like crying because it's true. I can give women the night of their lives but I can barely feel a thing. Sometimes I last so long I get soft from how bored I am that I lie that I nutted.

Attached: e039558e003f52792115fa8cdec5bf8de868b74bbc93aaec3cdf3ccfa1d81ea2_1.jpg (1600x900, 90.69K)

Who gives a fuck what women think.

4U.

Never heard of that.

You gave enough of a fuck to reply.

Fuck off and take your shitty rage comics with you

Oh shit, I took literally ten seconds to type a reply. What a faggoty response.

>“Male circumcision has no adverse effects on sexual function, sensation, sensitivity, satisfaction, or pleasure, especially when performed during infancy.”

>The researchers scoured the world medical/sexuality literature and found 36 methodologically good-to-rigorous studies examining the impact of circumcision on men’s sexuality. The two best reports met the gold standard of research, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials

>surveyed the sexual function, pleasure, and satisfaction of 2,784 uncircumcised sexually active adult men. Then they circumcised 1,391 of them, and re-surveyed the entire group every six months for two years. In every survey, the two groups showed no statistically significant differences in sexual function, pleasure, or satisfaction.

>conducted a similar trial involving 4,456 uncircumcised adult men, 2,210 of whom got circumcised. Before-and-after surveys showed no differences in sexual desire, erection issues, or other measures of sexual function, pleasure, and satisfaction. Two years after the procedure, 99.9 percent of the uncircumcised men said they felt “satisfied or very satisfied” with their sex lives, while among those who’d been circumcised, the figure was a statistically equivalent 98.4 percent.

>The other 34 studies showed similar results. In several, compared with men with intact foreskins, those who’d been circumcised often said their penises felt more erotically sensitive. In addition, circumcision had no effect on rates of premature ejaculation or erection or ejaculation difficulties.

psychologytoday.com/us/blog/all-about-sex/201510/does-circumcision-reduce-men-s-sexual-sensitivity

Simply a rumor spread by men with carrot tip dicks who are jealous of beautiful, clean and worshiped cut diamond dick. The science is settled.

Lol cope kike

ok retard

It does loose sensitivity apparently but hell if I can tell the difference (because it’s all I know). I just coomed & it felt great. I guess having a more attractive penis is just a plus.

cutfags don't realize that the head is fully exposed when erect for uncut chads. A girl wouldn't be able to tell the difference unless she's a turbo whore that notice the extra bit of skin instead of an ugly scar under the glans.

Imagine needing lo apply lotion before fapping.

Peanut worms need not apply.

> the head is fully exposed when erect for uncut chads

Attached: 1486324770721.jpg (270x270, 24.73K)

Attached: facts.jpg (1000x2821, 1.08M)

Only if you’re big lol

anteater pp

>Caring about other people’s dicks
The gay agenda, gentlemen.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Castleman
>Childhood and education
>Michael Castleman was born on February 2, 1950 in Brookline, Massachusetts to parents of Ukrainian descent. He was named after a deceased relative, per Jewish tradition.

E
V
E
R
Y

can't make this shit up

>not caring about mutilation of babies
The entire western world froths at the mouth when it's done to girls, but nothing for boys? Ok.

>36+ studies with rigorous methods
vs
>these posts
Ok brainlets just weave it into yet another of your braindead conspiracies

Goldberg telling Silverstein "lol you're right, mutilating dicks is great!" 36 times is only evidence of Goldberg and Silverstein's interests.

This is sad

ok

retard