What was her problem

There are generally 2 reasons for the idea that children shouldn't have sex:
a) sex is bad (Christianity is guilty for this in the west)
b) if you permit sex to minors, they are liable to be exploited by people who are more powerful than them.
b) does not actually say that children should not have sex. It just says that people are not trustworthy.

Femdom, nothing worse than looking for some decent Brother x Sister doujins and getting fucking femdom, damn.

I really liked the artstyle of this
the after-end extras page is top-tier too

Attached: freedom1300842278997.png (398x530, 401.95K)

>sequel never
b-bro?

Reminder that rape is bad and raping the disabled is even worse

america was a mistake

>shouts freedom
>smokes, eat, shoots gun, fucks her brother
Yup, its very Americano.

is this mistagged on panda? I'm not finding it with a few searches that should have picked it up

>Love the yupiel reference/homage.
Where?

>Religious repression of sexuality. And living in the hicks.
You are so retarded. What you wrote has nothing to do with what's in that doujin. They were both siblings and last time I checked it is fucked up no matter where you live and what you believe to do incest.

Attached: are you retarded.png (428x345, 106.25K)

What tags were you using?

Attached: Screenshot_20200511-033706_Chrome.png (720x712, 307.63K)

>it is fucked up no matter where you live
It is common under certain circumstances.
For example, in ancient Egypt hereditary laws were a bit weird, so in order to avoid having to split plots of lands endlessly, it was common for siblings to marry each other. The pharaos also married their sisters.

>a) sex is bad (Christianity is guilty for this in the west)
This used to happen during middle ages. If you think this is still true now you must live an incredibly sheltered and restricted life.

english sister nakadashi incest
I think I was using f:incest instead of the general incest tag though

>rapes her brother
>gets raped by her brother in the credits
It's like pottery

No, it started in the Roman empire. So it precedes the middle ages.
And it continued past the middle ages. It was recently weakened (mostly by the sexual revolution in the 1950s) and the sentiment is no longer as strong as it used to be. But It's still there.
Why do you think sexual censorship is a thing?

Just read it again and you're right.

I was mistaken here as well. Page 25 with her looking all smug and down on the brother. Just very similar looking to a lot of the yupiel stuff but nothing else.

>Religious repression of sexuality.
Bro, her mom wanted her to save her virginity for when she gets married and not get her rocks off by sexually abusing her little brother. There's nothing wrong with that

Which in turn resulted in having disfigured and sick children that didn't live for a lot or lived their lives in pain burdened by their deformities. Take Tutanchamon for example and his foot.

Oh, I definitely see it but you sure the artist was reference to yupiel for sure?
Also what was with the ending? Anyone care to eexplain?

I'm Orthodoxy and we have a kind of general agreement that American Christians are puritan and their views on sex were too strict historically. Maybe a good part of it it comes from American movies though.

The ptolemaics were pretty unique in the brother sister marriage thing. There is no evidence im aware of indicating common people emulated that. The same is true for gods (ptolemys were effectively demigods anyway) which were often in incestuous relationships but this never really translated to how real people behaved.

see