>DUDE I fucking HATE male MCs that means I'm smarter than you haha you look like some self inserter unlike me!
Why are so many of you like this? Sorry but men have always had more depth and nuance than women, thus male protagonists always make for a better story.
>CGDCT and harems are designed to be cute and relaxing shows >girls are cuter than guys and more focus on girls means more cuteness >having all the girls be in love in with the same guy only increases drama Explain how is a harem isn't made cuter and more relaxing (the very things it attempts to do) by removing the male MC and making it a CGDCT instead?
>literally proving him right Why even post if you're going to fall into his bait?
Liam James
Men are more interesting than women, it's not an issue of ""self inserting"" and your cherry picked collage doesn't mean anything. You are either a seething w*man or a disgusting tranny
Ryder Myers
>depth and nuance
Jose Taylor
>harems are designed to be cute and relaxing shows
>if you don't self insert like me you are a tranny!
Brayden Morris
I'm not referring to shows with harems but rather romcom harems. Most harems have some elements of slice-of-life, but those SoL moments would be improved by removing the harem as stated above.
>sample size: less than ten CGDCTs are more popular which is why some of the more average works are adapted, but the best still stand far above anything else.
That's not how statistics work. If we have different sample sizes with the same internal distribution of quality, then the larger one should produce more outcomes at any quality, not just average. The only way this wouldn't be true is if there are more average works to adapt from the source material (so a different distribution in quality) or the studios are purposefully choosing to adapt average works over high quality works which makes no sense. Or did you mean that the sample sizes are the same but because of popularity pressuring studios to produce more adaptations from one type, more works from the female variation are produced which again should produce a similar absolute number of high quality adaptations as the male one, assuming similar distribution of quality and assuming studios pick the highest quality works first. Also that moeblob garbage you picked as your best example of an SoL reveals some abysmal taste.
Tyler Robinson
Female SoL is popular enough that both the good and average ones are adapted. Male SoL is not as popular so usually only the good ones are adapted. So you can't compare the aggregate average of male SoL anime to female SoL anime to say that they are objectivity better than other. And the SoL genre in manga is too large to make any trends. Regardless, this whole argument started because I suggested that harems (and not guys themselves) make SoL worse and all-male SoL usually don't have harems anyways.
>can't appreciate W I D E or even explain why it's objectivity bad without resorting to calling it moeshit
Benjamin Price
Based
Adrian Lee
>heterosexuality >watching shows in which girls only lust after other girls or do braindead activities >feeling so threatened by the existence of male characters
Luis Walker
If the harem protagonist is literally me then it means that the girls actually like me.
Michael Peterson
>can't appreciate W I D E or even explain why it's objectivity bad without resorting to calling it moeshit I wouldn't call it objective but I don't like it because it's ugly and the characters behave in a cringy, inhuman way. Also the word you're looking for is "objectively", objectivity is a noun and I'm assuming it wasn't a typo because you used it multiple times.
Male main protagonists =/= self-insert main protagonits you issekai-loving little bitch.
Xavier Hill
It's less that female protagonists just aren't interesting and more that literally every story with a female MC has to be cute, fluffy trash. There will never be broken female MCs like Takumi from Chaos;Head because every author knows every discussion about their work will inevitably degenerate into people talking about how much they want to fuck the protagonist if they make a female one
Hudson Perez
>men have always had more depth and nuance than women No, men are sinpler by nature, therefore easier to write. Writing a good male character is easier than writing a good female character.
Evan Lee
Nice bait, but sometimes I just gotta have some girl on girl action to get my thing going.