What are Zig Forums's thoughts on shortstacks? Are they still a miracle of the universe?
What are Zig Forums's thoughts on shortstacks? Are they still a miracle of the universe?
They have milkers so they're alright.
I wish this was canon.
Some of them are pretty good.
>not posting her supperior form
Short is bad, breasts are bad.
Peak design is 180 cm tall, featureless, androgynous body.
Closest I've seen is Lain, but too short.
OP did post her superior form though.
made for mating press
Shortstacks are amazing!
Inb4 mods move this thread to god knows where.
I feel Zig Forums has a skewed vision of what a shortstack truly is.
Then enlighten us, oh wise anonymous.
A true shortstack is stacked in both departments. Immense breasts paired with immense ass - all within the confines of a small body.
>are shortstacks amazing
yes
Oppai loli
>Are they still a miracle of the universe?
yes.
Flat Loli
Or
Oppai Loli?
>oppai loli
No such thing, Its a loli or its a short stack
False
All you did was prove me right, thats a short stack. Not a loli
She is a loli with tits.
oppai lolis are also shortstacks
Don't argue with him.
He is an idiot who is in denial for liking little girls with big tits.
saved
Cute
>loli with tits
This entire sentence is an oxymoron. They are either a loli, or they have tits.
Fuck off
Is that Magister's drawing? I love his art so much.
Nice shit taste you have there, user.
How come lolis with huge asses or child-bearing hips are still considered lolis?
Because its part of the loli aesthetic. Tits are not. I also never said i didnt like short stacks so youre calling your own fetish shit.
Educate yourself and stop using terms wrong.
Tits are part of the oppai loli aesthetic.
>shortstack
God that is the most unattractive term they could have possibly picked for this phenomenon
What would be an alternative?
Cute Himari
You are not supposed to be attracted to the term itself you dumbfuck
>no areola
They should be like fuckin CD sized for those tits