Serious discussion thread for this doc: chainlink.docsend.com
I've actually read through a fair bit of it, and it's actually pretty damning. This isn't just FUD, it's a well researched document, and hits on a lot of areas that have already been noted.
What's Zig Forums's thoughts?
If you just want to shit post - do it in another thread.
You had three years
That’s some dedication to fud. Post it on reddit
It was shilled here like CRAZY at 40 fucking cents.
TOO LATE
It's over for Link
USE THE GODDAMN CATALOG
>Serious discussion
You are asking people to read 65 pages of FUD the same day Chainlink has hit ATH
I am willing to discuss it seriously, honestly just ignore the noise caused by teenagers who are scared to lose their 125Linkies. I've actually sold everything now so that I can research more about this on my own. Doesn't matter if it goes up by 1-2 dollars, I still made a lot with link and it actually feels so good to have liquidated that shitcoin after more than a year of holding.
Sooo: Is the problem of high API fees really caused by a correlation to the inflated price? like why would the API call prices be that stictly coupled to the price of the token, that's a stupid design decision imo, didn't actually know that
so you read the whole thing, and didn't notice how the whole thing has multiple grammar errors and it's hosted on the wrong zeus capital website?
>chainlink.docsend.com
It's really sobering. Honestly what I needed to read right now. Lately the news and price action has been so good that I've been letting myself get a little too optimistic.
My sell strategy right now is to not sell any until A) staking is announced, and B) BTC is past it's ATH - both of those are very likely to be huge catalysts to the upside. But now I think I need to really think hard about my criteria for selling if there's a big dump. Probably breaking the long-term curve on the LINK/BTC chart would be a big one.