Jojo

what is the lowest point and peak of arakis art? early 4 is probably his worst

Attached: diu_color_v01_003.jpg (1200x1560, 732.65K)

>YIKES
all of part 2
early part 4
second half part 6
>BASED
late part 4
part 5
mid-late part 7
early-mid part 8

Attached: file.png (799x830, 133.75K)

part 3 is based

Attached: st_color_v11_084.jpg (1560x1200, 1.24M)

Peak is mid to late part 7, lowest point is early 4 as you said.

Early part 4. Maybe most of part 3. I don't know how to describe it but there' something about part 3's art I don't really like. Some of early SBR also isn't particularly good. I don't get the complaints about part 6's artstyle though.

Peak is mid to late part 7. Part 8 sometimes reaches (or almost reaches) part 7's height but generally not.

filtered

1-3 are great, shit went downhill at 4 and only people who take dick up their ass like the fujoshit art

Attached: 988681__safe_artist-colon-triple-dash-q_edit_jojosbizarreadventure_logo_logoedit_logoparody_mylittle.jpg (1280x720, 161.13K)

Why out yourself as an animeonly like that

Based and trilogypilled

Attached: 195 trio.jpg (609x777, 240.55K)

Online scans don't really do it justice. I have physical copies of the manga and it's been pretty good from parts 1-8. Even the beginning of Part 4 isn't all that terrible

>lowest point
5-6
>peak
Modern Jojolion

Jojolion has been a blast to follow over the years.

Attached: 1579735794404.png (531x749, 149.15K)

Would you consider changing your based part 4 to mid part 4 rather than late part 4? Imo, I think it has more personality. It really shines in the Shigechi chapters where Josuke and Okuyasu were just being asshole teenagers.

I agree with you on pretty much everything else though.

Attached: unnamed.png (512x504, 376.7K)

So, you're a man of taste?

nearly ONE-tier art on this one

Early part 7 by far, even the best panels are marred by shitty art, especially in color

Attached: 1551683405354.jpg (685x385, 73.39K)

Am I the only one that thinks the anime has done a better job on character art than Araki, especially in the first few parts? Parts 1 and 2 Araki have weird blobby faces that are off-putting to me.

I do really like this art of Jotaro, but in the actual manga pages he's a lot more square-looking, which is replicated in the anime.

Attached: JotaroPart3Full.jpg (1800x2407, 499K)

The anime adaptations simplify the art and don't do a good job overall with a lot of poses where in the anime they just look really stiff.

get your eyes checked faggot

Attached: one.jpg (1280x720, 150.17K)

I don't disagree about the poses, but I'm speaking more generally about character designs.

Attached: 1122409.png (399x214, 91.19K)

>second half part 6
Shit taste. The end fight is utter kino.

Lowest point of his art is early part 4. Lowest point of the series as a whole is early part 6.

Attached: 9b1.jpg (713x532, 128.55K)

Araki made up zoom punch as an excuse for his horrible arms, right?

holy shit

It was a double page spread

HOLY BASED

>early 4
>worst

Attached: you interrupted my piss 4 this.png (537x557, 489.33K)

Attached: ZoZ5oUfaIXhF9I6Hb1rVAKVcIR0MvVXA796Qsv9wp5E.png (1560x1200, 3.2M)

Attached: Chapter_51.jpg (1560x1200, 1021.95K)

Late part 2 is good though, proportions are much better and overall it looks very pleasing.
Part 3 art is actually one of my favourites beginning from the middle. Early part 3 is a bit weird looking. Same with part 4.
I like part 5 overall but it has proportion and anatomy problems.
I don't like early part 6 art but it gets much better. Manga colouring is terrible in part 6 especially imo but Araki isn't the one who colours.
Part 7 is good overall. I personally think early part 8 looks really weird in some panels too, faces are much better and cuter now.
But Araki have always had problems with proportions and anatomy, they even exist in Jojolion.