What would be expect from staking returns for those just looking into others nodes? It’s all dependent on node popularity right, so won’t many perform badly? What if it’s only 2-3% per annum, it will have basically no effect on price as people won’t lock up their tokens for the large part? And it’ll crush the tokens value proposition?
LINK staking returns
Other urls found in this thread:
twitter.com
twitter.com
Whitepaper says 10k LINK in a medium functioning node should generate about $200 a year profits, which is not too shabby imo.
Stake pools will be a thing, NEET nodes will not be a thing, no matter how hard Zig Forums wants them to be. 99% of you faggots don’t have the technical ability to run a bitcoin node with no downtime, you think you will supply high quality desired data on top of that?
But my point is not all nodes will want infinite LINK, many will disallow additional staking to maximise their returns. Why have excess collateral with whom you have to share profits with when it’s not needed? Thus a lot of staking on shitty nodes, which are less used, will have crap returns.
The staking is a fucking joke man, at 2% you need MILLIONS to make a decent income
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? LMAO YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING ME. PLEASE TELL ME STAKING WIL BE BETTER THAN THAT. WHY WOULD ANYONE STAKE FOR SUCH GARBAGE RETURNS. JUST SELL THE LUMP SUM.
Wtf absolut bullshit
No hes right. Lmao did you really invest your money in LINK and didnt read the white paper? There is a reason people are saying 100k+ is the make it stack.
nah i dont have link. i dont get staking though. even eth 2.0 is like 4%. i would just sell the lump sum. who cares about staking for such low dividens
staking only makes sense for institutions. retards thinking they can buy up 1k-5k LINK in 2020 and get rich of staking lmao