Normalfags care for lolis and love them and all that gay shit. They get nothing out of it and lose money caring and raising real children. Lolicons satiate their carnal desires and don't care about social norms.
The lewd/protect dichotomy has always struck me as anti-sex. Why not both? I know there are a lot of Zig Forums diaspora on this board, but since when was mutually desired intimacy something that is seen as an act of degradation or violence? Will normalfags ever ask themselves this question? I'll lewd my loli and protect her simultaneously. That is typically how one treats lovers...
Why do you bother arguing with phoneposting ironic weebs?
Zachary Bailey
It’s christcuck cope
Jackson Collins
There's nothing wrong with being sexually attracted to fish, but it's still weird and people who aren't into it don't want to hear about it.
Levi Morgan
>volume 9 Did he really?
Matthew Barnes
You wouldn't?
Caleb Hernandez
Oh I absolutely would. I just wanted to make sure before I said fucking BASED.
Mason Fisher
Due to Powerbalancing Fertility Reasons it took 200 years of bareback cervix-smashing uterus-dropping mating press EVERYDAY
Wyatt Morales
This always confuses me too. I can understand christcucks since they're fucking insane and think that having sex somehow degrades you as a human being, but even for normalfags that don't actually believe that when it comes to someone who's even 1 second below 18 suddenly all logic goes out the window.
Cooper Baker
raising the age of consent was literally the first thing they did you complete buffoon
>all that garbage like you understand Christianity just requires you get married to a girl who is NBR. Sex with her is fine after that. Christianity is just anti-thot and anti-slut and has instructions on thot-patrolling in it, so coomers get all antsy.