Which one was the best and why is it Naruto?

I haven't into animu and mango since 2012 so I decided to finish reading the old big 3. Bleach was meh and felt rushed at the end, I guess it got axed, Naruto was very good and had the best story by far, every arc felt unique and the war was amazing and gave all characters time to shine and what an epic reveal Tobi was, no shonen will ever have such good tension and plottwists like Naruto did and it will be the standard to reach for future shonen authors. Meanwhile, One piece is still setting fail lol. How the fuck is that pirate wannabe still not complete and what is their even to write about? The story in one piece is not going anywhere lmao.

Attached: 96992EB3-B841-4BAC-9193-F7134CFE0B6C.jpg (1280x720, 91.13K)

nardo was the worst

Naruto was the best and its not even close. Bleach ended overwhelmingly bad and Luffy is still setting fail so Naruto wins by default.

All three of these are utter trash, but Nuruzu is objectively the worst.

Not him, but Naruto was absolutely the worst. At least One Piece and Bleach had arcs that were legit good, even if they ended up fucked in the end.

>Naruto was the worst
You're all delusional, there is nothing wrong with Naruto at all, meanwhile Bleach and One Piece are boring to read and drag on needlessly. And saying that some good arcs makes them better than Naruto, where all arcs were good, is pure cope.

>And saying that some good arcs makes them better than Naruto, where all arcs were good, is pure cope.
Ah, we see now, 7/10, took the bait I admit.

Bleach ended up dogshit but one piece has definitely had some serious kino

Hurr durr, I dislike so I call troll and I win. Stay mad, Naruto was better.
One Piece is fucking garbage after the timeskip. I felt like Luffy got an entirely different personality.

Can we let this shitass thread just die already?

What, this is cleerly bait i dont believe you read Bleach or One Piece

Fully agreed on Bleach aside of art which was bland and bad. Narutos writing, characters and story were top notch. One piece doesnt have good art, its just as bad as Bleach in that aspect and the other points are moot as the story just drags on, there are way too many characters to care about and I didn't feel any emotions at all. The fights pre timeskip were good but became trash afterwards.

>It is the worst mainstream manga to exist.
i know you're just shitposting but let me answer you honestly one time: one piece has impeccable world building and great writing, the fact that the arcs are all structured similarly can be entirely attributed to it being a shonen story. the plot encapsulated the feeling of a pirate adventure very well and that's why people became interested in it. the void century is not the main plot at all.

And one more, now photographic evidence.

Attached: 1317951546298.jpg (1092x422, 179.63K)

>i have adhd and can only appreciate one type of art

ok

Useless but she was hot.
>It's One piece
Nope lol. Naruto being the chosen one does not take away from his suffering and training that he went through all by himself in the slightest.
I read all of them.

Well then you’re clearly biased because your description of Bleach and One Piece is 1/3rd of your Naruto description COMBINED

I wouldn’t necessarily say that naruto was good. Pre-time skip naruto was excellent in its fighting, storylines, and characters. Even sasuke and Sakura were bearable because they didn’t get much screen time and all the main characters got fleshed out well. shippuden became a drama filled trash fest rasegan spamming eye hax nightmare. Granted it still ended better than Bleach, and as far as I’m concerned was more entertaining than the trash that is one piece time skip, but don’t go around saying naruto was filet mignon when it’s actually one of those thin beef steaks you get from Waffle House. It’ll do the trick, but man does it go down like a motherfucker.

Attached: 367C1935-C373-4017-AEB4-5CD005D3E4EE.jpg (1710x900, 91.11K)

>i know you're just shitposting
And why is that, are you psychic? Nope, im serious, deal with it.
>One piece has impeccable world building
Much of nothing just like the non existent plot.
Lmao, only Naruto has good art.

Naruto
>only 2 or 3 females are useful/interesting
>romantic development is present, but handled like dogshit
>naruto's fights are the least interesting in the series. largely uses same techniques over and over, in the same way (after early in the series)
>anime is like 50% filler and low quality as fuck outside of important parts/fights
>side characters are wonderful and largely ignored
>ending went completely batshit insane

Utterly revolting shit taste

>only 2 or 3 females are useful/interesting
just like real life

>there are people in this thread, at this very moment, that enjoyed bleach's story

Attached: 1592082053270.png (373x370, 68.19K)

What description are you referring to?
What many retards fail to realise is that Naruto accurately presents what it is like growing up as your feelings and worldview change which is reflected in the characters growth. Kaguya was also a good final boss because she showed that there always is a bigger fish and that you shouldn't dwell in your own hubris as Madara did.

why do people think one piece has better world building than Naruto?

>Naruto
Good show, had highest highs and some really low lows, completely agree its the best of the Big 3 BUT only for now as I think Wan Piece isnt far behind it. Sasuke is one of the best written characters in all of anime and hard carried Narutos very hit or miss 2nd part so he bumps it up by a lot alone, side characters felt underutilized but what could you really had them do in part 2? The akatsuki was a flop, Orochimaru got taken out quickly, and the 4gnw was mostly filler fights so who cared

>One Piece
Very good highs and some dreadful lows, series started off very fun and lighthearted but was able to blend in seriousness as well, now its just BORING like who cares? Get to the One Piece already and stop introducing more useless characters and wasting time, if One Piece can get back to its pre TS writing ill put it above Nardo

>Bleach
Easily the worst, boring, bland, forgettable and its fanbase has usually never seen or read the other 2 but claim its better. Bleach had an interesting concept and cool designs but that can only take a show so far, it quickly developed to: *teleports behind you* and “you’ce activated my final trap card” the series with no character development, Bleach also has like 0 memorable villains outside of Aizen, does anyone remember who Coyote Starkk was and what exactly he did?

Attached: 6733DAA7-8CA1-4555-BF64-6DE394A8A067.png (569x513, 550.3K)

>only 2 or 3 females are useful/interesting
Interesting is objective but there were more useful ones that.
>Romantic
This is a battle shonen, romance is for faggots and girls only.
>Narutos fights are the least interesting
They were good, it also depends how he uses the abilities which is what made the fights interesting.
>Anime is filler
Lots of it yes, but it was enjoyable.
>Side characters
Which is why they are side characters. If you want side characters being more relevant than the MC, read Bleach or One piece.
>Ending went insane
There was a world war, why wouldn't it get crazy?

you're a joke

They are idiots. Kishimoto did an incredibly good job and the world is big enough to be interesting, but some ADHD tards want more of nothing and think that quantity means better writing which it does not.

Lmao, youre an idiot kid. Get the fuck out of here.