Who else /all in on the king/ here?

Who else /all in on the king/ here?

dont care about any websites, e-commerce sucks, sending messages is worthless. feels good to be all in on AOL. It's too big to fail and everything that's not on there that's needed will be added to it later.

Attached: aol.jpg (750x534, 18.19K)

I'm buying simple because of its quantitative hardening as a store of value. That's it, really it doesn't have many other use cases. I wont ignore other coins though.

hell yeah bbooooiiiiiiiii

>feels good to be all in AOL
kekd
Hey man tech moves fast people dont always keep up.
On that note, invest in RLC

Attached: Polish_20200718_011920858.png (1366x2048, 3.21M)

I really hope this is bait, If so I had a good kek
If not, your understanding of cryptos isn't even past elementary. Remember 17' fags opinions are WORTHLESS
Somethings to look up
What is a sybil attack?
What is network effect?

Attached: Downloaded the image to Messenger_Lite.jpg (607x801, 21.04K)

>What is a sybil attack?
A sybil attack is a result of access being restricted only through identities that are easily and costlessly replicated (e.g. spam mail, reddit upboats). The hashrate takeover you probably mean is a 51% attack that is tied to costly mining equipment. All protocols with tokenomics gain takeover resistance as they get bigger, so using Bitcoin's size as an argument is like saying "it should be big because it's big." Cargo cult logic.
>What is network effect?
Something MySpace had, and something that the Ethereum ecosystem has much more of than Bitcoin's at this point. Nobody uses the BTC network for anything, yet every time some crypto faggot posts a browser screenshot you see the Metamask icon up.

How does $0 sounds after American regulatory laws swipe the cryptocurrency space?

This

I've quadrupled my money from playing with altcoins the past few weeks. I'm all cash now and I can buy 10 BTC now instead of having only 2.5 BTC and watching it crab.

Every bitcoin output has a unique history tied to it as part of its provenance. This is not only bad for privacy but actually means bitcoins aren't fungible. monero.stackexchange.com/questions/1967/what-is-fungibility-and-why-does-it-matter

A basic observation but there is a cult around BTC who enforce an orthodoxy of glossing over it.