Should I continue to hold link?

I bought link at 64 cents, and already got some good gains. I've been seeing a bunch of coins doing x10s these past months, Isn't it better to take my money out of link? Being honest, I think link doing a x10 from here on is less likely in comparison to other coins. Not saying it won't reach a x10 or even x100, I'm just saying that I could make more gains with other coins. Just worried about marrying a coin and missing out on other opportunities.

Attached: link.png (225x225, 5.97K)

Other urls found in this thread:

medium.com/get-protocol/get-protocol-integrates-chainlink-vrf-to-further-improve-blockchain-ticketing-solution-864c7056e73d
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Go ahead and sell then, faggot. Nobody is forcing you to hold LINK.
I'm 80% LINK and 20% other coins which I expect to pump harder in the short term, which I will then dump back into LINK.

This strategy has made me amounts of money you would call larping.

hodl and simply accumulate other coins. This is pretty much a sure profit whereas you could lose investing in others with the money you gained from link.
if you've got a job it shouldn't be a problem for you to invest in other coins and leave you link stack as it is.

10x is not unlikely for link from here man. but that said, just sell some linkies and use as capital to play around with shitcoins. i wouldnt get rid of all your link though, youre going to regret that

1 Link was never meant to cost more than a cup of coffee.

Don't you think you've would made bigger gains with other coins in the past few months. That's my worry, no need to get aggressive faggot.
That's the thing, I'm a student. If I was working I'd put some part of my paycheck into those coins, but I don't have that option.

Yeah taking some out is a good option. To be honest I'd regret far more staying with link and seeing the other coins I'm interested in doing x5s in the short term left and right.

LINK will, some day, skyrocket like ETH did in a manner that leaves every single person who wasn't holding it that day/week in the dust.
They will forever regret the fact that they didn't hold Chainlink when it went from $10 to $100 in a single week.

I will never let that happen to me. LINK is an S tier cryptocurrency, and nothing else even comes remotely close.
Theoretically, yes I could have made more gains by going into other coins and then going back into LINK. But theoretically, we're all made of cheese.
If you are playing too hard with other coins and LINK announces staking, you will never be able to purchase LINK for the rest of your life. Your ego won't allow it. You will not have the courage to buy it for $50 when just hours before the announcement you could have had it under $10. I refuse to be this person.

Thanks for the thoughts user. Sure something that big could happen, I guess. I just have some internal doubt that becoming a millionaire couldn't be as easy as just holding link. I never know if link 1000eoy is a meme or not, even worse, people say 81,500, what the fuck, could that honestly be possible? Just trying to look at this from an outside perspective.

$1000 is not a meme. EOY is a meme. But look at specifically what the LINK token utility is.
It is used as collateral in nodes to underpin the assets that the nodes are feeding data to.

Take for example DeFi, LINK powers almost all of DeFi right now. DeFi has $2.75B locked in it.
In order for the LINK network to be able to securely and reliably feed data into DeFi protocols, it needs an equivalent amount of LINK locked up in nodes as collateral.

This alone puts LINK into the Billions of marketcap.
Now consider the room DeFi has for growth, and how LINK will have to grow proportionally just to support DeFi alone.
Now consider everything that has yet to be functionally released: Oracle integration, Baseline Protocol, BSN
Now consider everything that has yet to even be announced in any capacity, such as LINK nodes providing data to traditional derivatives settlement. If any traditional derivative provider wishes to implement smart contracts and chooses LINK as the Oracle, we are talking about multi-billions if not trillions in assets that need equivalent LINK locked in nodes as collateral to ensure nodes behave appropriately.

The true value in LINK hasn't even been remotely realized, and as every single thing that uses/requires LINK grows (AAVE is a great example of a protocol that is seeing monstrous growth), LINK must grow proportionally to support this increase in TVL.