RLC is retarded

stay poor

Agreed. A marketplace for decentralized cloud computing is brilliant.

UHGGHH GOOD
I'M.. I'M... RECOOOOOVERING

Attached: recoovering.png (679x639, 106.75K)

Guys, don't explain anything to these cunts. Let them stay poor, lmao.

>I'm still mad af at RLC for talking shit about to link, but I may start accumulating.
>Especially since CZ pulled the dirty $.001 trick. That's a buy signal in my estimation

What and what?

If you are betting on iExec winning because apparently bitcoin will shut the bucket in the future and people will magically graviate towards iExec then I believe you need to reconsider your position.

Some applications mainly in science but also other areas require massive computational power. Like simulating what is happening to unexploded nuclear bombs that were never meant to sit idle this long. Since we clearly can't just go blow them up due to environmental concerns, we need scientist and programmers to simulate what is happening inside those bombs. Nuclear decay in all the different daughter atoms requires massive computational power, and there iui s only so many super computers farms to go around. Training next generation AI with massive data sets also takes huge computational power.

iExec solves that by tapping into cloud computing. Every single person that has a PC at home can offer the computational power of his machine to help solve these problems and earn some coins in the process.

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Attached: 1557759227671.png (513x468, 206.8K)

RLC did the doracle thing where they claimed their oracles were more decentralized than, and superior to, link.

CZ pulled the same bullshit he did with link where they manually added orders down $.01 (or $.001 I don't recall) and then flash crashed it to scoop up cheap bags

I'm telling you, btc's future is not gonna go how you think it is

Link and RLC are completely different use cases.

That is RIDICULOUSLY stupid. The only people who do not have access to proper computing proper are your average person. But there are already solutions for this. If you wish to run tensorflow code [used to write machine learning algos] you are able to use googles serves using "google notebooks" and run your code from there. There is no decentralization needed through that process. Therfore for those who will need computing power such as academics doing your nuclear bomb simulation they will surely have the power to do so. I mean we processed a black hole for Petes sake.

Is iExec trying to replicate a botnet and charge access to it & pay participant computers? What is it?

Attached: 4234234.png (1848x102, 18.9K)

The use cases that require massive computational power are growing to as the problems our scientists are try are getting harder and harder. Simulating massive nuclear decay us one I mentioned, also training AI with large data sets, mapping protein folding to cure cancer also requires big computational power, certain logistics problems, etc. iExec is a good long term hold.

i dont think you understand how computationally dense simulations can get.

Fuck, playing a perfect game of chess is so computational intense that barely only a few supercomputers on the planet can do so.

I don’t you understand anything about programming, let alone maths of computation.
You’re absolutely right. These guys are just newfags bagholders who are looking for the next link. It’s like the last 3 years haven’t happened and we’re having the same conversations about rlc again just to have newfags get burnt AGAIN

You have no idea what the fuck you are talking about. Researchers have been soliciting unwanted CPU from all across the country for protein folding simulations to try and develop a COVID anti viral. Thousands of people are donating their computers through the mail. This would solve that.

don't understand half the shit you sayin, but this guy gets it.

RLC 0.5 EOW. CHECKEM

Attached: 50-Cent (1).jpg (980x653, 133.05K)

you're wasting your time asking questions that expose this scam shitcoin. Currently it's being shilled heavily by a discord group, except their shilling game is so weak that they will only parrot "bitcoin of cloud computing" or just try to recreate LINK memes (reskin) and personalities (42-like methanon).

Says the guy that actually thinks the current computational power of AWS can handle complex simulations that haven’t even been invented yet.

Stay poor faggot

Rent free boys

Attached: 4535667566.png (1179x995, 316.23K)

SURE, certain operations can be computationally dense/intense but do you really think of all people that will be innovators in the space it will be iExec compared to AWS, the golden star of the Amazon ecosystem? Also it would requite a huge marketing campaign just to bring people onboard to iExec AND even along with this their combined power would easily pale in comparison to the Amazon conglomerate that is AWS.

Can you please explain what you deem to be a perfect game of chess? DeepMind is a team that is studying deep learning and one of the huge milestones they made was creating a model that beat the best Go player in the world, a MUCH harder feat than chess as rather than a spam of conditional statements (traditional AI) their model required tons of data and of course there was no mention of decentralized cloud computing.

youtube.com/watch?v=WXuK6gekU1Y

Do you have some links on this? I would love to see it. Also if they are already currently able to do this then what is the merit of RLC?

>Do you have some links on this? I would love to see it. Also if they are already currently able to do this then what is the merit of RLC?
I'm not totally sold on iexec yet either but:
the people would be compensated, thus more incentivized to participate

That is a fairly reasonable summary. It misses a lot of points, but its not a bad way of imagining it.

research is being limited by processing power, not the other way around

>an AI losing to a human back in 2016

Attached: 1594961882963s.jpg (250x211, 8.17K)

Proof?