Currently making 700$ / day by using a variation of martingale on dice. Chance to bust less than 3% per million spins (around 5 spins a second) with my bust threshold. This works because of the extremely low betting limit (0.0001$) and the high betting limit (10k) COMBINED with the extremely fast automated bets (5 a second). Using my method, I'd have to lose around 195 flips in a row to bust (under 90). If you use classic martingale with a bankroll over 100$, you'd need to lose around 22 flips in a row (38% chance of happening in a million flips)
You can tweak the betsizing depending on how fast you want to profit, but I suggest staying below 1/1000 of your bankroll a bet at the minimum. With my version of martingale I'd need to lose 210+ rolls, closest I've come to busting is 43 rolls. Check roobetstrategy.com/dice-strategy/ for more info.
You should also use a referral code when starting out (significantly more lossback), mine is found on my site, or you could refer yourself with a VPN (won't be able to withdraw though, ID required)
FAQ:
1. You were making 1200$ yesterday! I tuned down the initial bet from 1/1000 to 1/2500 2. If you really were making money you wouldn't be sharing this:
I get a tiny cut off every bet my referred users make, when everyone has this going on 24/7 you can easily see how profits will be going out of control - I also do giveaways among the referred.
3. It's a scam!:
No, it's not. The site is provably fair and you can check the bet ID after every concluded bet
4. This is guaranteed to lose money long-term
Yes? Given an infinite amount of time I'm guaranteed to bust. This might not even happen in even 10 years though, given the very low minimum bet and my high bankroll.
what is your bankroll what would be the initial investment
Jose Rogers
22310$ - Initial investment 8304$. Had a little too high of a betsize initially (came close to busting a couple of times), turned it down since, haven't even come close the last couple of days
Xavier Hall
Lottery is actually a good idea. They don't want smart people catching on and dumping $1000s a week into it.
Also pretty sure that's fake, there's no way a 232$ roll busts from a 0.09
Jordan Long
like you said, 1/2500 of my initial bankroll. you can see the bet amount and my deposit in the screenshot
Nicholas Foster
Show your bet history, how many consecutive losses did you have?
Juan Hill
everyone ignore this pajeet
Asher Robinson
Made a little money off this strategy, what would be the issue with decreasing the bet proportion even more and then just letting it run continuously?
Joshua Johnson
So if you flip 8 hours a day at a rate of 5 flips per second, and as you say there's a 38% chance of busting per million flips, then 1000000/(60*5*60*8) = 7 means you will have a 38% chance of busting every 7 days. Sounds like a terrible trade to me.
Jacob Jackson
Can you post your bet history?
Jaxson Robinson
Let's say you had a 100k bankroll, and your bet size was $0.001.
You would only have to lose 30 flips in a row to go bust (2^30 x 0.0001 = 107374)
It would take 744,261,117 flips to reach a 50% chance of having gone bust.
If you didn't go bust in those 744,261,117 flips then, assuming a payout of 1:1 of your bet size, you would only have made $74,426. At 5 flips per second, it would take you 4 days and 7 hours to reach this point.
You're better off just going to a blackjack table and putting your 100k all on black - for (near enough) 50% odds, you'd get a higher payout.