Brainlets still not understanding the significance of Ampleforth? Let me redpill you

There’s a lot of confusion and misunderstanding about the $AMPL protocol.
Is it a scam? No.
Is it Bitconnect 2.0? No.
Is it a Ponzi? No.
If it’s not all those things, what is it?

Here’s the narrative: The Ampleforth protocol is aiming to be crypto’s Federal Reserve.

Attached: Moon.png (603x472, 149.02K)

To comprehend why $AMPL can play an important role in the ecosystem, and become crypto’s Federal Reserve, it’s important to review a bit of history.
Crypto, up until this point can be divided into the following eras:

Crypto Pre-history: The Cypherpunk Age. Cypherpunks like David Chaum describe the history of things to come: Digital currencies, the fight for privacy and more.

Crypto Era 1 - The rise of Bitcoin. Bitcoin is created and technologists dabble in the technology. Eventually more and more people become interested in blockchain tech. The Occupy Wall Street Movement and the aftershocks of the 2008 financial crisis fuel the Bitcoin revolution.

Crypto Era 2 - The rise of Decentralized Computing (Ethereum): We all know the story, Ethereum is created and a distributed, decentralized computer, the Ethereum Virtual Machine, gives rise to thousands of tokens and expands the crypto ecosystem virtually overnight.

ICOs and Bitcoin’s rapid price rise lead to a crypto frenzy and the market reaches new heights.

Crypto Era 3 - Crypto Bust and Creating a New Foundation: The crypto market craters, many people leave the industry, developers hunker down to build products, many of them in finance

Maker launches over-collateralized lending and Bancor helps usher in automated market making. All of this work helps build the foundation of the new DeFi movement.

Crypto Era 4 - The Search for Yield and Crypto’s Liquidity Crisis: DeFi is utterly transforming how crypto natives use and view crypto assets.

In previous eras, they were content to HODL and wait for their assets to appreciate. With the rise of the DeFi movement, people longer have to do this. Previously idle crypto capital can be lent, borrowed and leveraged without the need to sell.

We are in a phase of the crypto movement I call the Search for Yield. Part of this search involves using stablecoins to escape the volatile crypto market, preserve capital and generate passive income. But the Search for Yield has had a negative side effect: A liquidity crisis.

The crypto liquidity crisis may not be obvious to many, but it is demonstrated best in Maker Dao’s struggle to keep Dai at its peg. The rise of yield farming has led to crypto users borrowing Dai at incredible rates in order to chase alpha. Maker has added additional assets, including WBTC which is in high demand. The printers at Tether and USDC are going at full force. But the demand for liquidity is outstripping supply and the most popular stablecoins have serious problems.

Tether is on shaky legal ground. USDC is useful, but it censors transactions, which goes against the Cypherpunk ethos. Dai struggles to stay-on peg and it’s hard to convince users to take loans, which are required to generate Dai. This liquidity criss needs to be solved if crypto is going to grow into a trillion dollar asset class. Some say Ethereum can play this role (along with Dai), but the main issue with generating Dai is that it requires Ethereum users to take loans out on their crypto. Not everyone wants to do this.

What about ETH? Ethereum’s growth (and maximum value capture) requires a successful transition to Eth 2.0, which is far from certain. ETH could grow in value to fuel the ecosystem, but the market is uncertain about whether it should be looked as anything more but (cheap) fuel. Wrapped BTC such as renBTC and WBTC can satisfy some of the demand for liquidity, but again, it’s a slow process to port over BTC value from the Bitcoin chain.

What’s needed is a new asset. Most importantly:

-It must scale with the growth of the crypto market

-It must be uncensorable

-It must be relatively stable

-It must be based on sound money principals


At present, $AMPL meets 3 out of 4 of these criteria. But, its value is not yet stable. And to gain stability, it must scale. $AMPL could be THE asset for crypto’s Search for Yield Era.

History lesson over.

So what is the Ampleforth Protocol?

In simple terms, $AMPL is a protocol that can serve as crypto’s Federal Reserve. Here’s how the Fed works (basically). Currently, the US dollar is the world’s de-facto global currency. Debt, contracts, stocks, bonds … everything — is dominated in dollars. It’s the world’s most trusted currency (for the moment).

This reliance on the dollar led to a problem: There aren’t enough dollars to satisfy demand. And, without dollars the global financial system would seize up. Ordinarily the rush to the dollar (and reliance on it) would cause the value of the dollar to skyrocket against other currencies. That would cause a lot of problems, so the US Federal Reserve prints trillions of dollars to inject liquidity into the market to satisfy global demand.

The Ampleforth protocol can be viewed as an automated Federal Reserve. It is a scalable synthetic currency that is not backed by collateral, only itself, a primitive like Ethereum and BTC. Like the Federal Reserve, the protocol expands when demand is high, and contracts when demand is low.

But, there’s a crucial difference: When the Federal Reserve prints dollars the first beneficiaries are banks. What do bankers do when they get money? They invest it into stocks, bonds and other assets. The Federal Reserve’s money printing has led to an asset bubble where stocks do nothing but go up.

As I mentioned before, the Ampleforth protocol has the ability to inject liquidity into the crypto ecosystem when demand is high, and remove liquidity when demand is low. This is all achieved in a rules-based, automated fashion with no human and political intervention. Unlike the Federal Reserve and bankers, the extra liquidity generated by the protocol (in response to demand) is given directly to $AMPL holders who are encouraged by the protocol’s rules to sell their tokens to the market. This helps transfer liquidity to the ecosystem (and achieve price stability).

$AMPL can’t serve as the crypto’s Federal Reserve unless the token has massive liquidity, to the tune of billions of tokens. So, the team has launched liquidity initiatives in order to encourage crypto natives to help grow AMPL’s presence on decentralized exchanges and help the token reach the scale needed to be used in DeFi protocols (through demand-fueled price inflation).

Demand for AMPL is high. The AMPL/WETH liquidity pool is currently Uniswap’s largest, and is generating huge fees for liquidity providers. Right now, like Bitcoin, $AMPL is very volatile. This is because the market cap for the token is low. Because AMPL delivers liquidity to token holders rather than bankers, people have gotten distracted from AMPL’s true purpose: Becoming the People's Decentralized Federal Reserve.

So, what’s up with this “free crypto” that people are so excited about?
Think about it in the terms of price appreciation.
When Bitcoin’s price rises, all token holders benefit from higher USD prices.

With $AMPL, when demand is high (people want to buy the token), instead of price skyrocketing (because of the protocol’s focus on keeping the price of the AMPL token relatively stable), the token’s supply is inflated.

So, capital injected into the protocol does not increase the price, it increases the supply. In other words, demand energy is channeled away from price appreciation toward supply appreciation.

Here’s another way to look at it: holding AMPL is no different from owning Bitcoin when it rose from $1000 to $10,000. But, instead of price gains, holders enjoy supply gains. The AMPL protocol is only re-directing capital’s energy from spiking the price (which only helps holders), to increasing the token supply (which can help redistribute capital to other sectors of the crypto economy).

This is just like capital provided by the Federal Reserve is expected to go from banks to other sectors of the US economy. The plan is for the $AMPL token to reach a large enough size to be integrated into exchanges, lending products, etc. And the team has launched liquidity initiatives, that are no different (in spirit) from other bootstrapping efforts, to do so.

So to sum up:
-What is $AMPL aiming to become?: A decentralized People's Federal Reserve that can solve crypto’s liquidity crisis with a non-censorable, sound (non-dillutable) currency.

-What is the end goal?: To replace Tether writing with $AMPL printing.

-Why do holders receive new supply?: When demand is high, instead of encouraging holders to hoard tokens, which leads to supply shocks, they are encouraged to sell surplus $AMPL for crypto assets that can be re-directed to other parts of the crypto economy, not stuck in wallets

As you can see, $AMPL is NOT a Bitconnect promising unsustainable ponzi-like gains.
The Ampleforth Protocol is aiming to be the People’s decentralized Federal Reserve.
The perfect asset for the Search for Yield Era.

ok

The more biztards don't understand or get the importance of it the better I feel. The next financial elite need to be smart not some incel that fell into a crypto cause of a.meme.

scam

16k AMPL reporting in

But answer this:

> wut about privacy?

I am picking up a small bag of XHV, just in case. Similar to AMPL, but not quite.

What the fuck is up with the gas fees? Ridiculously big

It is inevitable.

$1 EOY

So, compared to the MC at the rebase time last night, the MC today is lower. Does that mean we'll get a negative rebase today if it stays at this level? Or am I misunderstanding something?

another scam

Jesus fuck just read the docs.

We have negative rebase only if price per coin is

theres nothing stable about it though
you cant stick your money in and expect it to have the same value in a month
to who should it matter that the value of the token stays basically level when its not something you can just do the equivalent of buying and sticking under your mattress

no, you only get a negative rebase if it is below $1

Dubs and I FOMO in

This is pretty wild, sounds exciting

What are some valid critiques of criticisms of this idea

id be bullish on ampl if it had a plan to make transactions quick private and cheap but its on fucking ethereum so its trash

i got 1700, whats the make it and suicide stack

My main criticism is that it's not there yet, for the vision to become realized AMPL needs to have a shitton of liquidity which currently doesn't have. It's the same criticism I have with BTC replacing the dollar, it needs a gigantic marketcap and liquidity for it to work. How we get there without real utility? Just by pure speculation? That's my main question.

Another criticism would be that currently the project is not decentralized enough, there are still admin keys and the dev team is a big single point of failure. Ideally you would want a decentralized Fed without a centrallized dev team and zero backdoors.

Nevertheless I think it's a very interesting project and experiment, and I would ballpark its potential in the same level as BTC.

you pay them **only twice** in your life, when you buy and when you cash out your make-it stack.

Oh how the tides have turned.
A week ago I was viciously attacked for trying to explain how AMPL works and why it is the path to financial freedom and now I am so happy to see that more and more anons will make it due to this asset. Very happy for all of you frens

Has this project had a big push from the crypto youtubers yet? Or is that still to come?

Are there other coins in the top 50 that have struggled with liquidity? I really want to know, not even ironical

Literally every coin, even in the top 10, struggles with liquidity. Even BTC can't stay stable when there is a single order size over $100M, which is something ordinary in traditional finance.

Attached: 1595345985875.png (750x722, 587.39K)

Based explanation. So simple, it is what the federal reserve/central banks have been doing for centuries. So many of you faggots dont get this.

A Rothschild dicksucker/biographer being on the team is just a coincidence.

Just a few small and medium sized channels.

Attached: 20200721_112455.jpg (1542x1360, 207.13K)