Reminder that dividend chasing is for mentally ill braindamaged cucks. The cuckfolio is a small collection of the most shilled dividend stocks here on smg.
They can't even beat SPY. Imagine that, putting in more risk for shittier returns than fucking S&P500. Dividend cucks are truly brain damaged
Okay, last reminder but the GNUS ST page is a treat. You will see every single variation of bagholder cope imaginable there. And corresponding shitflinging between bagholders and dedicated bears that is steadily getting more toxic as the share price sinks lower. Oh, and because of the traffic, its also now a dumping ground for PnD bots. All this mixed in with images of children's cartoons. This is great.
Carter Robinson
microsoft and tesla about to dunk the entire market, maybe
Justin Brooks
Alright lads I have 6.5K. If I put it all on TSLA tomorrow, what's maximum upside and downside? No memes, just hit me with some numbers
TSLA valuation is pure hype. It's impossible to quantify that kind of volatility. It's a pure degenerate gambling move to go hard on earnings date when its valuation is based on SP inclusion despite it already being worth more than Home Depot
Zachary Watson
First for DFFN moon mission. And also cunny appreciation.
Jonathan Watson
Dividend chasing is worthless unless you've got 6 figures plus invested
Sebastian Young
No, not even then.
Aiden Lee
I always chuckle when I see the divi nerds posting their little 10k dividend portfolio. Just all in some otm options or some shit.
Kayden Jackson
Since there is technically no upper bound on stock prices, while there is a lower bound (at 0), the expected value of any stock is infinite. Think of a probability-weighted average: although the probability of TSLA going to infinity is not high, infinity times anything is infinity. So the expected value of TSLA is infinity.
Brody Perry
Dang I hadn't realized how bad KEY was doing. They're sitting right on support, breaking up tomorrow would mean they'd go waaay up, breaking looks like back to 10.50 :O I'm not even convinced good or bad earnings would matter for them, they're totally divorced from their financials. Big buyers deciding to pull the plug (hehe) wouldn't necessarily need to come from earnings since their financials aren't factoring into their price action @_@
Of course picking winners beats an index. But not many can do that. spy, qqq and tqqq are no brainer indexes with tqqq being the slightly more risky one
Elijah Carter
I want to fugg this comfy big tiddy doggo. I'm gonna make her my doggone girlfren.
>not many can do that Yes they can. Just buy LITERALLY any worthwhile company. I think it was Buffet-sama himself who said the stock picking is less like trying to find the needle in a haystack and more like trying to find a cow in the chicken coop.
What's going on with TTNP? I thought I'd have to carry these bags forever.
Gavin Johnson
bearish
Ethan Sanchez
>70%+ of active funds underperform their benchmark indices, especially over longer periods of time DUDE why don't they just hire you to manage billions of dollars? You seem to have it figured out
Brayden Gomez
Shit posting with money
Ethan Fisher
Me and everyone else here wish we bought AMD at $2 when it was a no brainer in 2016. They were huge and successful even back then. But here we are
Easton Edwards
Where my option writers at? Proper crab were having
