Why do people hate her again?

The good part is taking a leisurely tour through Sakura's demented horny brain. Kiara is just the cherry on top of the libidinous pink sundae.

Attached: 56d21455538e9_56d213fc843cb_1773288198.jpg (860x516, 66.99K)

Because she's a trashy Saber clone cashcow instead of a psychotic cute boy.

She burned a part of Rome and blamed Christians for it.

Well no shit, Last Encore is awful.
She was pretty cool in Extra
Seeing cool Gil is fun though, and it would make better use of the Extra cast without the need to kill them off one by one as they get interesting. The only downside is that Shinji, Gatou, and Julius are without their servants

penis envy

A slut

great ED though

Christains burned a part of Rome and blamed her for it.

She's a Mary Sue.

>She's a hidden last boss
Fixed it for you

Sadsack Briton trash and Christian suicide cultists buttraging about being BTFO constantly. Disregard such LITERAL plebians.

ROMA

ROMA

ROMA!!

Attached: __nero_claudius_and_nero_claudius_fate_and_1_more_drawn_by_redrop__sample-a62872050c06da78a04e5baccd6877c1.jpg (850x1125, 301.09K)

>Hillary Clinton writes a biography of Trump in the middle of campaign year and it's used as a history book for a thousand years
Fucking people.

Attached: 1585802893356.jpg (1000x1414, 268.9K)

I don't personally believe it but let me shitpost for a bit

So can she beat Lucius Tiberius

Because Nero is a really fucking bad choice of historical figure for such power wank.
More important roman characters in FGO come across as jokes and writers have hard time unfucking them (their recent attempt kinda flopped).

It's absolutely a possibility. Reminder that the word "zealot" as in crazy, unhinged and violet religious fanatic, literally came from these exact same early Christians under Nero's rule. They weren't just jihadi-tier crazy murderous psychos, they were THE ZEALOTS the rest are named after. Nero was right to destroy them at every opportunity. They were the early Taliban. Modern-day FBI watch list material at best.
My point about Hillary/Trump is that what people were taught about Nero until very recently (like 5 years recently) is pure propaganda written by his political enemies. The proverbial history that was written by the winners. Political smear campaigns and attack ads and Huffbo shill headlines that became "history" taught as fact. The real Nero was well-liked by the people and foreigners and while certainly eccentric, was mostly the fun kind of crazy (doing outrageous stunts, giving out money and food, hosting festivals, actually did build that Golden Theater from Fate). Also likely to have done some classic Roman Emperor style evil shit, for sure, but nowhere near like people have commonly accepted. No burning anything, none of that.
Or to put it the other way, imagine if we had Trump write 1000 tweets about how shit the Clintons are and Pizzagate conspiracies with his full boomer mindset, then we decide to canonize that all as historical fact to the point that in 2,000 years, history professors are teaching kids that Hillary had secret pizza-based child sex cults all over the place. That is absolutely the same as what you are doing when you think of Nero fiddling while Rome burns (or any iteration where Nero was even in the city when the fires happened for that matter). Pure goofball fantasy, over the top cartoon propaganda for the lowest IQs. Neither Clinton nor Trump are good people with clean hands, obviously. But you don't push their fuckin' cornball two cents worth as historical fact. Yet with Nero that's what we've gotten.

Attached: 1545808551383 (1).jpg (6038x4291, 2.44M)

Nero is a great choice. The worst choice is being too super obvious or too obscure (Julius is too obvious and a boring pick due to that). Nero is not so well-studied or known to the average human as to be totally trite, and has a lot to work with and explore, but it a household name worldwide and has entire idioms about him, and was featured in high-profile ways repeatedly in the Bible itself to boot. On top of that, Nero was a passionate artist and has a driving sort of emotional core there you can feel through the ages. Larger than life. Yet you're never ever just trying to pick "who's the most famous" either.
If they're known mainly to history buffs, they're bad servant picks. Laymen need to know them immediately, which is true of Nero and Julius and maybe Caligula, much less so Romulus. Popular conception is what makes a servant, not combat prowess in their actual life, or how strong you think they should be. Nero IS fame itself, art itself, madness itself. Passion = Nero synonymously. An absolutely stellar pick for a servant, second to very few.

Attached: __nero_claudius_and_nero_claudius_fate_and_1_more_drawn_by_redrop__eb283de1eaf3d16a40a4563adac63754.jpg (657x900, 104.03K)

>Reminder that the word "zealot" as in crazy, unhinged and violet religious fanatic, literally came from these exact same early Christians under Nero's rule

No, it came from orthodox Jewish nationalists in Judea. They were only related to Christians in that they were Jewish, which is near to no relation at all.

Is that so? I'll take your word for it user, but first I'll need you to say HAIL ROMA.

Is there any misdirected antipathy here (the Bible shitting on Nero for fursecution of Christians) or is that also just lumping them all in together since the Bible, unlike yourself, says early Jews are absolutely intrinsically related to Christianity, being direct ancestors without which they can't exist.

Attached: UMU DESUUU.png (276x263, 60.08K)

Whore of Babylon.

Shitty dindu