Jurors of Zig Forums: I'm here today on behalf of users on the 'Yes' side of Kleros case 302. I present to you the following evidence: ipfs.kleros.io
A short summary of the dispute is available at youtube.com
I urge all PNK stakers present to vote fairly and in good faith based on the information above. Furthermore, memes or any other contributions to the thread are greatly appreciated.
Kleros Case 302 - Day 3: Court is now in session
Chase Edwards
Other urls found in this thread:
kleroscan.com
twitter.com
twitter.com
Gabriel Russell
why
Carter Garcia
Based pink ID.
The obvious answer is Yes here. >1000 deaths was in fact reported.
Dominic Allen
Currently Yes is winning by a large margin.
Mason Perez
How is this allowed
Why is this wanted
How is pnk successful
What
The
Fuck
Xmr or fuck off
Brayden White
This shit is interesting, love pnk and omen
Adrian Walker
Isnt it a flaw that votes already casted can be viewed before the end?
Chase James
>How is pnk successful
Look at the use case.
Definitely. Luckily, Yes is the correct answer, so people right now are incentivized to vote Yes or risk a penalty.
Levi Howard
>This shit is interesting, love pnk and omen
This is honestly one of the only cryptos that actually does anything kek, it's amazing
Adam Anderson
Voted Yes.
Juan Campbell
kek looks like it's time to dump bois
Jason Lewis
Sure, because Zig Forums has never been right before, right?
Elijah Murphy
People were shitting on Zig Forums linkies since 2017. And now look at them. PNK is the same story. History doesn't repeat, but it does rhyme.
Andrew Reed
"As this two step processes of committing and then revealing one’s vote requires additional user interactions, in some low stakes courts, one might want votes to be issued publicly to simplify the user experience. Which system is used is determined via a court parameter, see Section 4.11 ongovernance."
From the yellow paper.
Nice Id there user, good luck.
Chase Lee
lol.
This isnt a dispute case.
This is gambling!
OP and jurors ITT are degenerate gamblers!
Brandon Jenkins
this bugs me too
why are votes visable?
did realt.io fuck up making the case so that the votes were selected to "visible"?
surely "invisible" is an option somewhere (does it cost more?)
Ian Green
Every juror has to do 2 transactions if votes are "invisible": one to commit the vote and then after the period ended one to reveal the vote.
Yeah this is not really a "low stake court" I guess, so votes should've been set to invisible.
Carter Thompson
>Small poll of jurors
>Able to view the voting process
>Jurors in the loser side lose staked pnk
>people already associating Kleros to Zig Forums
Sure fren!
Ryan Barnes
Source? Asking for a friend...
Lucas Edwards
I got my Yes vote in already btw
What about this is gambling? Vote based on evidence.
Xavier Nelson
bump
Levi Evans
So what are some more uses of the kleros court system? I understand this case as a proof of concept. Where do we go from here besides hype and the token price increasing? Not FUDding, I hold a lot
Wyatt Scott
>So what are some more uses of the kleros court system? I understand this case as a proof of concept. Where do we go from here besides hype and the token price increasing? Not FUDding, I hold a lot
In the last thread someone proposed using it to debate controversial topics such as the Holocaust.
Connor Cook
it's on case 302 so it's been around for a bit, this is just the first high profile case to have happened (so far)
Mason Hernandez
kleroscan.com
"Yes" currently leads by a 50% margin (two to one).
Connor Mitchell
bump
Grayson Nguyen
Jacob Sanders
How come this address with 69mill pnk gets to vote 80 times?
0x00B5ADe4ac1fE9cCc08Addc2C10070642335117F
Cameron Kelly
the distribution is weird
Caleb Lee
lol wtf!
Brandon Stewart
goddamn, that's 5 million dollars in pnk right there