They are about to have a complete monopoly on the derivatives market, (Worth 1.4 Quadrillion dollars.).
If only you knew how comfy things really were.
Read pic for spoon feeding.
They are about to have a complete monopoly on the derivatives market, (Worth 1.4 Quadrillion dollars.).
If only you knew how comfy things really were.
Read pic for spoon feeding.
Other urls found in this thread:
qed.vc
youtu.be
youtube.com
twitter.com
good but please don't spread globe earth propaganda
1) they used swift and other logos on their marketing misleading people to buy the token.
2) The team dumps 1million link on heads a month just like Ripple
3) The only usage is when the chainlink team makes a price feed contract and shoves it down a defi projects throat. Everyone that thinks chainlink has customers. Lets see how many customers stick around when they have to start charging.
4) you said what went wrong...what went wrong is you are still holding after it went from 30mil to 1.5 billion. The money has been made on link. There are better projects with a hell of a lot more upside.
Do you want me to continue?
5) Chainlink claims to be decentralized yet team holds more than half the supply
6) Chainlink claims to be decentralized but runs every single chainlink oracle contract (what happens if chainlink forgets to fill up eth or link?)
7) Chainlink is all big on "oh were blockchain agnostic" meanwhile there is no other blockchains getting 1/10 the traction as Ethereum. Blockchain agnosticism is a meme.
8) The link token was supposed to be needed due to erc677 transfer and call. Not one customer is using transfer and calls as they are only pulling prices from reference contracts ran by centralized chainlink team.
9). It's been over a year since main net. The biggest customer is some dopey defi platforms. Yet sergey will use swift and facebook libra on slides.
Shall I continue?
10.). Type in $link on twitter, you won't find a more cringe community. I keep seeing "we're so early" from soccer moms from Chattanooga. Meanwhile most OG link holders have moved on.
11.). If Chainlink is doing so well, ask any of the customers for the info on what they are paying to use chainlink. You will never get an answer because they are using for free. They have to pay by advertising they use and pay for chainlink.
Good God...i'm so excited for all of you
>Zero competition
>Less technologically advanced than iExec oracles
>Centralized supply
Kek ok OP
iExec already bent the knee
Link bent the knee to our superior computing. You need iExec. iExec does not need you.
Haha ok
Take your meds
You know this image is retarded because it describes a trustless system as trustworthy.
The World Economic Forum hates blockchain, they are working with Holo for the great reset starting Jan 2021
>Link bent the knee to our superior computing. You need iExec. iExec does not need you.
this fud just confirms that we all should buy some more stanky lankys
>he doesn't know
Slow and steady wins the race.
Once you go flat there's no going back, fren
kinda obvious you're a bagholder, mate
FUCK YOU SCAMMERS
>FUCK YOU
!FUCK YOU
>FUCK YOU
!FUCK YOU
>FUCK YOU
!FUCK YOU
>FUCK YOU
!FUCK YOU
>FUCK YOU
As a Person of Retardation, and a Person of Little Cash, a POOR, if you will
I have to say
U dum
hey simeon
>They are about to have a complete monopoly on the derivatives market
every post you make is you digging your own grave deeper
quit it already
we all know who you serve
and Father knows you
Based
Jesus christ here we go again
>Jesus christ here we go again
mfw
Lads, I've got 8 whole chainlink
Will I make it?
Last year the global market cap was 90 trillion USD. As we move forward into the fourth industrial revolution, the global market cap will increase significantly. By 2025 the market cap for all cryptos combined will be at least 30 trillion USD. LINK will be a top 5 coin by then. Think about that.
>I've got 8 whole chainlink
actually you have:
8.000 000 000 000 000 000 link tokens
remember:
>18 decimals
Their competition is the entire world of software and coding. No reason to implement a volatile asset (or any asset) into insuring API processes.
How does $11,200,000 sound?
>No reason to implement a volatile asset (or any asset) into insuring API processes.
you sound dazed and confused
read the letters that I'm (((SPELL)))ing out for you:
S-M-A-R-T C-O-N-T-R-A-C-T
I'm actually going to be able to afford the ice cream as well as my big mac meal, such wealth, man.
The founder and chairman of the WEF wrote this book and explained the important role crypto-currencies would play in the fourth industrial revolution.
Sounds pretty fucking good to be honest.
You'll have to hold until 2030 though, maybe sooner if all goes well
>The founder and chairman of the WEF
>maybe sooner if all goes well
sooner confirmed for going well
>The founder and chairman of the WEF
pic related
thank you Klauss for going out on a limb for us Zig Forumsraelis
/thread
Can’t believe these fucking retards think they’re getting their hands on the derivatives market
A smart contract is nothing but code.
Simple, beautiful code.
Smart contracts don't need crypto.
Transactions don't need to be insured by staking an asset (even a non-volatile one).
Hope I'm not dead by then, that'd be sad
But if I die and my keys die with me then that just increases the value doesn't it?
Please don't dead me to make yourself richer
>Transactions don't need to be insured by staking an asset
let me guess
you trust "digital" books over paper hard copies
you're still young
remember how Stalin erased old photos?
that would be a lot more difficult to do with a system like chainlink in place
If a wallet goes inactive for over 5 years then the tokens should be returned to circulation imo
That gif gives me the worst case of blue balls bro, fuck you
>Please don't dead me
don't worry brother
keep a sober mind and pray to Rabbi Yeshua bar Yosef
ask him for help, we will be under spiritual attack all our lives
resist the temptations and live righteous by God's example and instruction