Better than Chainlink

fucking use google mongoloid

A Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) is an environment for executing code, in which those executing the code can have high levels of trust in that surrounding environment, because it can ignore threats from the rest of the device.

I'm trying to get people to discuss it you retard. A google definition isn't what I'm after.

Why doesn't Tmobile partner with RLC then?

They'll work together. Stop trying to divide us jew

Attached: ie plus link.jpg (1077x1600, 121.93K)

I mean it kind of explains itself, no?

Fair enough. I was just hoping to see some people knowledgeable about the tech discussing the two oracle solutions on a more interesting level.

cout

Attached: A3873FE5-CE3F-4140-87A1-04F36C80A82C.jpg (251x242, 10.29K)

Yeah i get what you're saying, but I'm just saying if one can do TEE and one can't that's kind of a big deal since the one without it is oracles only for a use case and the one with is many use cases

the author of the first post went back and clarified and you're just fudding cause youre a brainlet

This thing. iExec. They litteraly have something that does work and they are being negatively shilled here.
Somehow Chainlink doesn't have what they pretend to have and are shilled the hardest...

While(1)
{
SeetheAndCope();
}

So why do I keep hearing that
>RLC has better oracles
on here? Is this just shill talk from people who don't understand the projects?
Seems that RLC is just has a broader scope. That doesn't necessarily mean it's better than Link oracles for what link oracles are meant to do. I'm also not quite clear to what extent the projects will integrate, considering RLC is apparently using Link, but also working on oracles.

>negatively shilled

How can you willfully ignore that LINK oracles dont have SGX/TEE/staking but RLC had them for 1 year? and oracles arent even RLC's main purpose?

>The year is 2048
>Toe-sniffing has become a profession after scientists discovered that foot odor predicts breast cancer with 99.9% accuracy.
>RLC bagholders all become toe-sniffers.
>Literally the untouchables in society, sniff the feet of their mistress and the latter's daughters everyday except occasionally taking a nibble out of their painfully rationed MREs.
>itsallsotiring.rlc
>One day
>Toe-sniffer accidentally licks his young mistress's feet
>Young mistress instinctively stomps the toe-sniffer into a state of unconsciousness
>Runs to her linkholder daddy with tears in her eyes
>"Daddy! Metha Non's tongue touched my sole!"
>Link quadrillionaire flies into a fit of rage
>"How dare that RLCuck taint my daughter's feet with his saliva?"
>Decides to euthanize toe-sniffer, in accordance to the terms of the smart contract (running on Chainlink, of course)
>Toe-sniffer dies from lethal injection
>His children, legally in the possession of the Link quadrillionaire, end up on sale in the Wuhan flea market
>Humans are now on sale after a niche group of Chainchinks pressured the government to legalize cannibalism.
>Linkholder goes through the paltry possessions of his former employee for auction.
>Finds a Quantum Cryptowallet still running on 1.0
>Becomes curious
>Extracts internal data through the latest iris projector technology.
>Sees a 87000 RLC make it stack worth $100
>Throws away entire wallet in utter disgust.
>$100 can only buy you a cup of coffee.

This is the future you choose for yourself, RLCVCKS

Attached: 1595324367740.jpg (905x1010, 552.27K)

Hey RLCucks
Where's your Tmobile partnership?

Attached: basedT.jpg (490x252, 26.62K)

who gives a fuck child we are talking about technology here not superficial partnerships

Wait for them to add more apps and make their thing easier to use. Just wait.
They already announced an academy to teach people to use their thing for September. That will already give them a great uprise.

I'm not ignoring it. I just don't have anything to add to that fact.
I'm curious though, why are so many projects integrating Chainlink vs RLC? If RLC is so clearly better and more advanced, shouldn't we see it showing the signs of becoming the industry standard?
I honestly don't care to win any sort of argument here. I'm just trying to understand this whole thing a little better.

Because RLC is pretty unknown? and iExec isn't really pushing oracles as their main thing while chainlink is and apparently oracles are all the rage right now?

We should just respond by "Where are your 6PhD.?" to shills like you

So it's just that Link has had better marketing basically?
I'm still not that clear on the relationship between Link and RLC. What's pic
all about if they're actually competing?

It's not like iexec doesn't have any super large partnerships.... they are partnered with some of the biggest companies in the world

Not sure if its marketing but yea it's just more popular and i guess a lot of people dont know that iExec has oracles because they don't market them really.

iExec is more focused on the main goal of creating a large network of computers

Attached: 7WD8PnM2.png (1890x1922, 1006.52K)

So they are apparently using Chainlink:
medium.com/iex-ec/chainlink-and-iexec-collaborate-to-address-the-complex-off-chain-needs-of-next-generation-702e55ab1ead
So I'm really not clear on what the whole
>RLC has better oracles
really means. Are they in competition at all?