IExec holders please counter this

>c-centralized

So fucking what, how does that matter to Johnny CTO

>well this service requires a Rube Goldberg scheme of buying internet coins in order to pay for it, creating a capital gains/loss nightmare for accounting, why the fuck would we do that
>w-well it's decentralized

What is the advantage over Azure or Amazon or Google that could possibly justify the fuckery of paying for it, rather than clicking "Pay Now" on a website and being done with it

>what is profit motive
stay poor

refer to the "use" of iExec will get easier, faggot retard. Ever use technology when it wasn't easy to use?

Shut the fuck up.

Theres a million reasons my man.
-avoids single points of failure
-data is far, far more secure on a decentralized platform
-costly equipment can be idled
-access to far greater computational power
-assets (now computing power) can be directly monetized
-increased ability to share data with others outside of the otherwise centralized infrastucture
And more

And think about this. Youre a young startup business. You dont have a server farm or the infrastructure to process large amounts of data. Well, with iexec now you do.
It is massive. It is world changing technology.

Attached: Edntv7wWoAI67fp.jpg (1280x1024, 202.59K)

Not all companies have the server farm or infrastructure so they use centralized cloud providers without any problem...

lmao, so the whole thing is based on the HOPE that this could possibly offer enough savings to offset the accounting nightmare that it is GUARANTEED to cause

Best of luck with that.

>And think about this. Youre a young startup business. You dont have a server farm or the infrastructure to process large amounts of data. Well, with iexec now you do.
>It is massive. It is world changing technology.

Holy fuck, are you not aware of Azure/Google/AWS

Attached: 1594836112283.gif (640x640, 2.63M)

Again, iExec isn't a competitor, it's a global marketplace, Azure and co lose nothing participating.
It means everyone from some chink GPU miners to Finland data centers can sell computing power, it turns computing power from a service to a global commodity.
Finally for off-chain computing connecting to smart-contract you NEED something like iexec, you can't use a centralized provider to power a Dapp without defeating trustlesness, censorship resistance and resilience.
The transaction is the exact same FUD as with LINK btw.

AGAIN, DECENTRALIZED CLOUD IS FLAT OUT BETTER AND MORE EFFICIENT TECH
SO WHY WOULD THEY USE AZURE
AWS AND AZURE SUFFER OUTAGES
ITS COSTLY
SO YOU CHOOSE A DECENTRALIZED OPTION
AND WHAT RESOURCES YOU DO HAVE, CAN BE EASILY MONETIZED USING THE FUCKING DECENTRALIZED CLOUD
IT IS THE SUPERIOR CHOICE YOU ABSOLUTE FUCKING GRUG

see
also
>why do companies want to use iexec to make more profit
kek

Dude. I invested in the Chainlink ICO. Granted, I sold early but I followed the FUD threads here for years. What you are saying is a near identical criticism that was used against LINK every day

5 5s halllly shiettttttt

>BUZZWORD
>BUZZWORD
>yelling rather than arguing

Imagine I'm a CTO who's happy with his AWS cloud services. I just met with the CFO and proposed using volatile internet coins to pay for what we've already got, creating thousands of capital gains/losses events rather than a single payment, and he punched me in the nose. Tell me what to say to him so the CEO stops laughing at me.

>desperation
>fellow Zig Forums users this is just like the other successful coin!

You realize that makes no sense, right? Chainlink is an oracle interpreter. This is "digutl ohl"

The main issue here is that they're too dumb and look at the present instead of the future.
They're like "why would I need a supermarket with products from everywhere on the planet when I can go see John and buy turnips and eggs directly from him?".

They don't understand that actually using a token (even without going into the details of why it's needed for the consensus) is in fact a lot faster, more practical and cheaper for a transaction between a small chinese cloud provider and a brazilian client.

They don't understand that there is no contracts to sign, no registration to do, no anything, you can switch to any provider you want anytime you want on a single unified interface.
They don't even see how much problems (being in terms of costs, privacy or flexibility) are solved by a global dataset and cloud marketplace for things like IoT or smart-cities.

>is in fact a lot faster, more practical and cheaper for a transaction between a small chinese cloud provider and a brazilian client

Holy shit I didnt even consider that.

>implying LINK won't automate the whole process and get entirely rid of excelmonkeys

Doracles are more superior than links oracles
What rock do you live under dude

doesn't matter. Same arguments were made

>no corporation will use a volatile token
>they will make their own
>there is no financial incentive

lol linkies are so deluded

lmao oh my god, you actually have no argument

I hope nobody seriously falls for this retarded scheme

Attached: 1595556236683.jpg (646x687, 68.61K)

lol its funny how all the rlc memes (including digital oil) comes from chainlink.

>t. doesn't understand the implications of a worldwide market for supercomputing cloud computing and data renting
kek stay poor dunning

FUCK YOU 4CHANNERS I BOUGHT THIS DIGITAL SHIT BEFORE THE ETH PUMP I HATE YOU ALL AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

neither do you do

Then sell for a loss and buy like 5 eth for all of your savings lmao

why would they just use legacy systems connected to an oracle service?

>doesn't understand that the organization who actually require those services at scale will just pay for them in cash, like they currently do, thus not creating thousands of capital gains/losses events per day

>hur
>dur

I've made it pretty clear -- even if this could somehow cut costs to half of what Azure charges, which it can't, no enterprise will ever use it.

In fact, actually, this whole iExec protocol could run perfectly fine on USD. It does not need a volatile token.

Did you not realize that oil is basically useless in the real world, and that if you owned oil and needed to do work with it, you'd have to run it through a complicated and expensive process of refining before you'd end up with some gasoline or diesel you could actually put to use? Which nobody will ever do because you can just buy gasoline or diesel pretty much anywhere in any quantity you want?

In that sense "digital oil" was a perfectly accurate descriptor and you can't blame these guys lmao

Attached: 1595462441333.jpg (720x403, 23.43K)