You aren't getting my digital oil, 50cent. Google was never hyped as a partnership, you just can't read because you are a stupid nigger.
"A tech giant will soon JOIN IN THE MISSION for data protection and privacy."
That doesn't imply partnership, it implies an interest in one of the core benefits of iExec. It implies that iExec is on the right track.
>iExec is proud to have joined in this program and have been working on the project since the alpha release.
>The project >since alpha That means that Google specifically contacted iExec to work on something with them.
>iExec will offer expertise in the context of confidential computing with blockchain Meaning they are going to sell Google on iExec and why to use it for blockchain confidential computing.
>and will present work and use cases alongside Google in the near future.
This speaks for itself. Now stop being a fucking faggot, nigger.
>coping so hard that he has to spin a damage control thread immediately
OH NO NO NO
Jonathan Morgan
when will it recover tho
Luis Price
oh sure any faggot can join lmao and provide feedback thats huge faggot cloud.google.com/confidential-computing the same goes for intel which has 300.000+partners. All those partnerships are joined from iexec fucking retard. I hold it lol since ico but I want fucking adoption (discuss EDF you fucker that was a fail and absolute silence on that huh) and actual use of the fucking empty marketplace after the years not fucking shilling 50x daily from you you fucking meth faggot. Your conclusions are so fucking lame and wrong. Also I am tired of when a company joins this its shilled like oh well shilled anyone can join for a fee faggotic fuck it doesnt mean they are partners confidentialcomputing.io/members/ , confidentialcomputing.io/join/ Just stop your fucking threads I have 10x bigger bags than you you faggot jsut let it be, it may or may not work out, but your constant shills are so fucking cringe. RLC has good tech but actually zero demand and usage period. So let it be already you faggot you are not helping.
Jason Wood
Cringe. Enjoy your fantasy world, retard. Just don't run to fiddy crying when shit finna go south (which will be very soon).
Staying poor is your choice. I'm just giving advice.
>oh sure any faggot can join Then where are the other confidential computing blockchain projects?
Where's LINK?
HMM??
Right.
>damage control More like nigger caging.
Stop being a fucking nigger.
Robert Sanchez
Make another meme 50, You lazy ass. You are getting old with the same content everyday. The downfall meme was great. NSMDO
Connor Mitchell
>Implying truthbombs are merely memes.
I can see your strawman from a mile away. Try harder next time Pajeet. Your telecommunication skills may work on some tech-illiterate boomers, but definitely not on me.
So I was fudding iExec like there is no tomorrow over the last couple of months because none of you in these threads can articulate it well at all or explain the actual use case when this wins over AWS or Azure. Turns out it is because there are no use cases there... yet I looked at your marketplace. It is completely barren right now but it actually exists and works. My understanding is that it only just started as well, and is about to be rebooted too. That is very, very impressive. The tech is there, at least somewhat to do a PoC. Here is the problem though — there are little to no use cases to decentralized computation. It just doesn’t make sense. When I saw this, I thought long and hard what could be used for this, and I guess I could came up with some public drones/robots/cameras that may need to do some high grade computation to scan an image/photo/monitor premises in a public place..? Assuming iExec will have adoption, this would make sure the uptime of these robots’ computations at all times. However... if we are not in a fallout-type apocalypse, there will always be a datacenter closer to these robots in their own local place who can do these computations faster due to latency. I just can’t come up with a reason to use iexec at all. They might have something with the privacy preserving TEEs but, again, even they brought up those up in an article with google and intel saying they are offering VMs like that already... where does iExec come in? This needs some huge, international and global project that has to use global decentralized resources for some reason rather than localized data centers. I get the idea, it is just maybe it doesn’t need to be decentralized. I don’t know. We’ll see. Every asset with proper fundamentals behind it had its day. The problem is that iExec already did the shitcoin shuffle years ago... what an odd project. Picked up 1 ETH yesterday just to stay in the loop.
