The real reason Shueisha dropped Matsuki like HOT POTATO
(1/23)
>I asked the editor about the issue of actors, but there seems to be a problem with "Sam's Son Law." This is a problem in which the crime is linked to the profit of the work by increasing the sales of the work by causing the writer to raise the name recognition. If this is left unchecked, it goes to the point that legislation is necessary, so it is appropriate to discontinue collection.
Other urls found in this thread:
twitter.com
yaraon-blog.com
twitter.com
>(1/23)
are you this desperate for attention? the character limit is 2000, not 200.
(2/23)
>The censorship of the actage is said to have stopped imposing public legislation, such as "Son's Son Law," on the floor. When the law is enacted, the freedom of publication will be lower than it is now (even doujin or minor publications will not be able to publish). Supplementing the above, the editor is not the jump editor.
(3/23)
>As an aside, for example, if the 18-ban manga artists listed in LO had an incident like this, it would be unavoidable to be discontinued. That's why LO is very careful, and often mentions that he should strongly condemn and prevent sex crimes, and that neither authors nor crimes are committed. The level of consideration changes depending on the medium
fucking pedos I swear...
(4/23)
>There are many adult readers of Shonen Jump, but since it is for children, it is also necessary to consider the media according to the content of the incident. The content of the case is also important, for example, even if the SM writer is injured in an accident during SM with an agreement (breaking the rope that is tied), it is presumed that the responsibility of the SM magazine will not be asked, Content is also important for public consideration.
(5/23)
>This is also a digression, but since the original author who is the suspect owns the copyright, there is a possibility that the original author will cancel the publishing contract with Shueisha and issue an actor at a minor publisher, etc. , In that case, I also need permission from Shiro Usazaki, who is the creator of the drawing, so I do not know what will happen.
(6/23)
>Everyone may have the image that the publisher is the strongest, but regarding the right (control) of the copyrighted work, it seems that the copyright holder is the strongest, not the publisher, and can control the copyrighted work is not it. In the case of a manga that is divided into the original work and the drawing, the right of the original author who has the primary copyright seems to be very large.
(7/23)
>I think it is appropriate to discontinue collection, but those who want to publish the actage should not tell Shueisha about that, but after the original author is released, the author cancels the publishing contract with Shueisha. I wonder if it might be more realistic to request it from another publisher (a major publisher seems impossible, or a minor publisher) or a doujin publisher.
(8/23)
>The popularity of Actage has expanded significantly due to this time, so when the hot air got cold, the original author teamed up with another drawing author, a minor publication that does not care about the face of the publishing industry or individual coterie publishing. It seems like it would be possible to publish a sequel to Actage, and I don't think it's possible that the sequel will never be read again.
(9/23)
>As of now, there are many people who bought actage due to the increase in name recognition in this case, so considering the problem that the increase in name recognition due to crime is linked to the interests of the author, it seems appropriate to discontinue collection. Right. I would like to avoid criticizing other publishing groups that the Hitotsubashi Group has left such a situation.
(10/23)
>If you think about it, it's structurally similar to the annoying youtuber (a problem where youtubers earn money by notifying you by criminalizing and legally committing criminal activities in the gray zone). .> Problem of actor
(11/23)
>Detective novelist Kentaro Komori pointed out that "Sam's Son Law" means that criminals make money by publishing their criminal experiences, and in this case it is not true. "The law" is a problem, and the aspect of "making a profit by the name recognition of crime" will be a problem for the Hitotsubashi Group."
Jesus christ this gotta be a bannable offense
(12/23)
>If the Hitotsubashi group neglects the aspect of making profit by crime recognition, the issue of actors will be viewed by other publishing groups as "how do you think about CSR in the publishing industry?" , I think that criticism has a problem, and the theory that should be limited to legal liability does not pass from the perspective of CSR
>(1/23)
The absolute state of tourists.
>(1/23)
>maybe 3 lines
Kill yourself tourist
Kill yourself you fucking Plebbitor
13-14-15
>Regarding CSR, I am a gamer, but BANDAI NAMCO puts a lot of effort into CSR and has a comprehensive CSR website, so I recommend reading this.
>BANDAI NAMCO “It is CSR [Corporate Social Responsibility] that we are willing to work for the benefit of the world so that everyone can live and be comfortable.” (What does CSR mean?)
?BANDAI NAMCO is a company with a proud part as a gamer focusing on CSR, so I would like it to be known more. I think fairness will increase if the publisher group is listed like the Kadokawa group and accepts SRI (Socially Responsible Investment).
It's hardly news that WSJ was covering its ass. If there was more money in siding with the author, they would have. It's just business.
(16/23)
>Regarding "Sam's Son Law", this is "to suppress criminals from gaining publicity for crimes and gaining profits from works related to crimes such as memoirs (forfeit their income)", so the above tweet is "crime I will reiterate that I have taken up only the aspect that "the person raises the name recognition by crime and earns money".
>(1/23)
This is advanced newfaggotry
(17/23)
>Actage, the information that resellers are buying up comics in paper is a topic that you can buy with electronic books. It is culturally undesirable to sell books more and more because of the author's criminal charges (the name of the crime leads to sales), and I feel that it should be dealt with.
Holy shit. You're telling me LO is one volatile lolicon mangaka away from being discontinued. Its only a matter of time.
(18/23)
>The fact that Actage e-books are selling fast is that they are financially profiting the suspects because they are not original (the influence of the nationwide reporting of criminal charges). I think that culture should not contribute to lowering the hurdles of crime in the form of enjoying financial benefits because it is a problem similar to annoying youtubers.
(19/23)
>I think the culture should not contribute to lowering the hurdles of crime in the form of enjoying profits, but publishing should not be stopped by law, and it is ultimately up to the public nature of the publisher. It can be ignored by major publishers, but I think it may lead to regulatory issues, as society loses trust in publishing.
We're seeing shitposting taken to a new level, and it all took was some user going Literally Twitter.
I'm not sure if he's just literally retarded and copypasting it from twitter or actually advanced shitposting.
Also learn to sage
(20/23)
>Acceleration of sales of books (electronic books) is clearly a problem in the report of the author's criminal charges, and I want you to keep calm... The actor is the copyright holder, so if you're willing to remake or write more, it's going to be a minor publisher or coterie after release, no need to boost the buying boom
(21/23)
>If cultural monetary gains (copyright fees) are generated due to the impact of crime, it will seriously damage the culture and reduce the hurdles to crime, so I think that the act censorship had this decision. , I don't think that the continuation becomes unreadable because the copyright belongs to the author (can be published by other publishers and coterie).
(22/23)
>If you cancel the publishing contract, the work can be published normally by other publishers. In the case of actors, the viewpoint of publicity becomes a problem, but I think that there are usually minor publishers who want to publish remakes or sequels because they prepare the drawing even if they neglect those viewpoints ...
(23/23)
>If the author, as the copyright holder of Actage, writes the sequel such as "Actage 2" while exercising the copyright, it can be drawn (published) by another publisher even if the publishing contract between the author and Shueisha continues. I wonder if. What's going on with the sequel?
