DMG Chad General: Stansberry Research Edition

What is the Stansberry Research Report?
>Whales pay $6000 a year for subscriptions
>Report sets DMG buy target up to $2
>Indicates potential assets under management at $1 trillion
>Interest to DMG holders at that price is $40 per token
Who do you trust more? Raj and his pump in dump gang? Or professionals who shilled KNC before it pulled a 900% gain?

Attached: 1595225293423.png (705x470, 293.35K)

Other urls found in this thread:

etherscan.io/token/0xEd91879919B71bB6905f23af0A68d231EcF87b14#balances
coingecko.com/en/coins/dmm-governance#markets
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>Relevant page

Attached: IMG_20200726_053804_980.jpg (681x897, 203.81K)

>>Interest to DMG holders at that price is $40 per token
what, is this really in the report?

>current implied token price : 0.02
lmao

Yeah it's really in the report. I can post the whole thing but it's quite a few pages. The 40$ dollars is assuming full token dilution AND only 1% interest on the assets under management. Which is laughably low. I'm happy with the number so it's being allowed to slide.
>Attached is page 1

Attached: IMG_20200726_053743_919.jpg (714x881, 148.32K)

See
Look in the table. Remember I didn't make this numbers. We're talking about individuals who actually know what they're talking about.
>Page 2

Attached: IMG_20200726_053749_437.jpg (687x905, 197.64K)

>Page 3

Attached: IMG_20200726_053753_765.jpg (677x898, 192.86K)

This is the comfiest hold of my portfolio in a long while

Centralized shitcoin pretending to be DeFi

All decentralised protocols has to be centralised at the start. This is normal, and even Chainlink was considered centralised at the start, even now some might still consider it centralised