Would Nazi Germany be crypto friendly?

Would Nazi Germany be crypto friendly?

Attached: 05aug-nat-news-p9-hitler.jpg (380x285, 87.23K)

of course.

Hard to say, history is written by the victors. I think you would have had to have been there to know for sure. In any case why does it matter? It’s never coming back. They lost

>They lost
For now

Probably not. Nazis did the same central banking faggotry as the Jews, but instead it was controlled by Aryans. Said system is better for whites, but still.

>totalitarian regime in favor of decentralization
I have my doubts.

That's what I thought.

I want to believe it would be a pro crypto Utopia but it's probably wrong.

We could have ETH 8.0 already dude...are you joking, easy 1Link 10k Reichsmark eoy.

But spiritually they won, thus needed to lose and sacrefice all, to be a fudding light in the jewish endtimes sceneraio

It would be so utopian we'd never even need blockchains to fight jewish finance

no. people are being accused of being cryptojews all the time

Attached: doom.jpg (720x505, 66.87K)

No. They preferred to print money for free using Mefo bills.

>For now
You mean forever. Ugly people always lose in life.

Attached: 1592172707634.jpg (1858x1116, 192.51K)

>spiritually they won
That must be why the US is a 98% white country these days.

No.

They'd only allow the use of their own shitcoin, and it'd take a lot of convincing to even get that, fucking nazis weren't known to be smart

>Nazis weren't known to be smart

Attached: 1593460944310.jpg (235x369, 13.65K)

>Would Nazi Germany be crypto friendly?
Yes because it makes the Rothschild shit their panties

I see you're not exactly a student of history.

would’ve been interesting to read Hjalmar Schacht’s thoughts on crypto, he was a keynesian, who used monetary policy to bootstrap Nazi Germany’s economy to historic effect

Goering however was a retard and would have just exit scammed ironcoin or whatever gay coin he would have paid laborers with

it makes both the rothschild and nazis seethe because it's anti centralization

No, because it is speculative and not nationalized.

(((history))) like how the vikings were kangz?

Attached: 1595091019713.jpg (250x250, 5.32K)

>Would communism be crypto friendly
No, retard

actually their goal was the currency to be back by farmer output, or some shit

Ideas can never die

You can't print Mefo bills with crypto. That answers your question right there.

>State controls everything
>Decentralization friendly
What do you think retard? Ofc not

Crypto is firmly libertarian
Libertarianism is gay as fuck
Homosexuality is degenerate
National Socialism opposes degeneracy
You are a fag

this
you degenaretes wouldnt even need to meet on a shitboard like this one.
Instead everyone would have many acres of farmland in russia and a white family.
you would also already have used a decentralized oracle network in the 80s to fetch future prices of your goods as well as inscurance.
the actual base layer would actually be poa anf centralized but how else would you keep the americans out if there were some of them left.

mefo bills are QE and a smart contract would have made them even better for their purpose, plus crypto would have allowed them to skirt the restrictions of Versailles and avoid indemnity payments even more easily. He seems like someone who would’ve been intrigued by crypto at the very least

nat soc is too perfect for imperfect humans, only a very small percent is on the high end of the spectrum, so it's another utopia like many others

>so advanced and utopian OMG
>so poorly and inefficiently managed that they had to steal agricultural lands from the Ukraine.
Only one of these is historical.