Why isn't /ll/ (lesbian lolicon) more of a thing?
Why isn't /ll/ (lesbian lolicon) more of a thing?
Other urls found in this thread:
Mya-nee nailed it first time out and they don't want to draw the comparison
Read more manga.
because female pedophiles are super rare and not enough people like yuri to make up for it. it does exist though, here's a really nice manga
mangadex.org
Because we can't have nice things
Why is the ugly hag on floor greasy?
Because lolis are for men.
Hana is kinky like that
people have shit taste
OneeSho anime when.
For a combination of niches it seems to have a reasonable amount. In recent years for serialised work it doesn't seem too far off the amount of normal loli series.
It is.
I want a show about a female teacher lusting for her female elementary students.
>female pedophiles are super rare
Consume more anime and manga before posting.
only doga kobo is brave enough to tackle it in motion with any regularity
>female pedophiles are super rare
You believe this because of feminist bias in the media you consume. It's not actually true at all.
Give Itou an anime.
>tfw no lolidom /ll/
>because female pedophiles are super rare
no, they just go unnoticed because its more normal for women to work in childcare than men, and a woman showing a little too much interest in kids would just be ascribed to a "maternal instinct" or the like rather than anything creepy.
We all know it'd end up the non-/ll/ series if she did get one.
she should be voiced by Sayaka Ohara
So motherly!
This scene pissing off a bunch of pronouns-in-bio dummies on Twitter will never not be funny.
at the very least there are far fewer females who identify as pedophiles or some other chronophila attracted to minors. i've seen a few unscientific surveys online.
This isn't pure love