AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

same here bro just dumped this high iq ponzi

First time? Really. Cause you seem like a total noob. Lol

im not a trader at all lmao. just have held chainlink since 2017. i knew what i was doing was wrong but i still hit sell for some reason.

>checks ampl price
>1$
we did it amplchads! 1$ eoy!

>where sometimes a good one actually washes up
How can you distinguish?
For me if the project is on uniswap is already a scam

youre a clown the price dipped for one day and you sold LMFAO holy shit you have no excuse youre just a faggot

AHAHAHAHAHHA

Half of biz panic sells, then CB pumps it the very next day.

AMPL is the gift that keeps on giving.

Live Laugh Love

Just gauge if there is any significant amount of attention being given to a project. If you see a new one pop up in the catalog every day, over, say 3 days - perhaps it's worth looking into.

If it's some kind of closed ecosystem ERC20 token, it's probably not going to explode. When projects like AMPL appear, the fundamentals are just so strong that you have to respect that kind of potential.

>the fundamentals are just so strong
could you tell me why?
Could you sm it up?

even though it recovered a little in price, aren’t all holders now holding less ample than before?

this has been done before it never worked in the past, in fact one of the original . elastic models (Hayek Money) became a classic example of why elastic supply models don't work

There are two significant primitives in this space, BTC and ETH - and neither are good mediums of transaction.

The prospect of having the opportunity to get in on a M0 currency, which this space really needs to grow, has to be enticing, to say the least.

I guarantee you, that you have never had an efficient version of this before now. I understand a lot of the work is based on a paper from 2014, however the progression of oracles is really what has enabled this.

> classic example of why elastic supply models don't work

> in 2014 before Chainlink and decentralized oracles

Stay poor fag

Yes, but the AMPL you have is also worth more. This is how a readjustment of supply works (and why this is non-inflatable).

i fucking hate retards
is it really that hard to understand rebases?
when one precious number go up the other one go down to balance it
really that simple

so if it dumps you literally can’t lose money, is that the idea?

You can still lose money while the price may go up the total supply deflates meaning you have less Ampl worth slightly more

There's nothing high IQ about AMPL.
Once it's a stablecoin, there better be a good reason to choose it over other stablecoins.
And, regardless, you "easy money" dipshits won't be that patient.

Also, welcome to crypto. Try to learn the lessons before the bullrun takes off.

oh boy, in a major golden bull run using these defi platforms would cost $1000 in gas per transaction, i'm looking forward to it

>what is the use-case for DAI/USDT?

i hope tooth user sold at $1.22 on kucoin

99,9% of cryptos are a scam. The world don´t need more than 20 public blockchains and a few private ones.

how many times are you wingnuts going to fall for the same trick... oh it's going up again... kek

Attached: 1561320304137.jpg (399x385, 43.81K)

I mean, of course you will lose money if the market cap permanently deflates, but it is simply not going to. There is way too much interest around this project for that to happen. Every time the price drops under the target range, everyone who sells is going to end up kicking themselves, because the permanent loss that they decide to realize at that point is going to be mind-blowing next to the minor fluctuations that negative rebases would incur.