2dpd

5D MASTER RACE GANG REPORT
FUCK SPACE
AND FUCK TIME

Attached: 1598970348140.jpg (1200x950, 488.13K)

>when you realize that shinobu is actually 3d waifu if you like her at any age
2d is for plebs that fell for dumb slut that will hit the wall soon and very hard

Attached: thumb-1920-935460.jpg (1920x1311, 519.08K)

Second from the left is just asking for it.

Would you slap her top-down on the left, or bottom-up to the right? I can't decide.

Nice one-dimensional ass.

I want to parametrize their functions if you know what I mean.

>waifus
Kill yourself.

my waifu [lim x->0 sin(x)] is honorary 1D and the acutest!

someone skipped the linear algebra classes I see

Attached: 1575067298975.png (654x702, 415K)

You don't understand what 2D means.
Or waifu.

>They are bent in 2 dimensions but they are still 1D,
Drawings in manga are also lines that are bent in 2 dimensions. And that makes them 2D. Are you stupid?

>an anime waifu
*anime girl
>is curved in 3 dimensions but it is still 2D
That's actually a 2D representation of a 3D body distorted as it is stretched into 3D.
The only thing that is 2D about the result is that the image was never supposed to be stretched into the 3rd dimension (even though it was sold for just that purpose).

it's OP's fault for not defining the axes

>he doesn't know

They exist in 2d space but trace 1d paths. Sure the curve is defined by two dimensions in the plane where they're constructed, however if you were to exist within the bounds of the line itself you would have no concept of any direction other than the positive and negative path the curve takes. Because they're constructed in 2d space there will always be two variables to define them depending on the axis, and can only be at most representations of a 1d figure. The difference between OPs pic and the lines bent in two dimensions in manga is that they both are constructed in two dimensions and trace a path that has more than one axis of movement. While in some figures you may be able to traverse two dimensions while following the path, if your movement is bound by only one dimension there exists some representation of it wherein your path can be described by one dimension

>trace 1d paths
They don't. 1D implies no excursions into the second dimension.
>if you were to exist within the bounds of the line itself you would have no concept of any direction other than the positive and negative path the curve takes.
You have redefined OP's images to not depict "waifus" (read: girls), but rather the "waifus"'' residences.
>The difference between OPs pic and the lines bent in two dimensions in manga is that they both [do the same thing]
I suppose you meant to write something else here? In any case, what you wrote, is correct. There is no real difference. Because they are both 2D drawings.
>While in some figures you may be able to traverse two dimensions
Again, see above.
You redefined OP's image. You are trying to cheat, except you are pretty obvious about it.

he's right you know

And yet it's impossible to not have a figure that travels two dimensionally on a two dimensional medium. Even one that appears to travel in one dimension only does so from our arbitrary axis and there are an infinite number of axis constructions which would have it extending in both dimensions. The fundamental difference is that it's a representation, and because it can be defined by only one dimension, we understand it is one dimensional. I had meant in manga the pictures themselves extend in two dimensions, there is no way to define them as one dimensional figures without losing information, however with a curve that traces only one dimension you need only to find the representation of that curve where it's only defined by one dimension - which exists because you can travel the entire curve while only moving forwards or backwards along it. If anyone redefined the argument to be about the waifu's residences it would be you, because you're arguing about the 2d surface they exist on and not themselves as paths.
Let me approach it from a different angle. Had he posted 2dpd, post 3d waifus here and attached a picture of a 3d girl, we wouldn't be having this argument despite the fact that the 3d girl is clearly only 2d in the picture, however as a 2d representation of a 3d figure, we implicitly understand the image traces a depth the medium can't describe. In the same vein, we can understand the medium prescribes a width to the curves as a natural consequence of being on a 2d medium. You're right in that they are 2d figures in the same way you'd be right that a 2d picture of a 3d girl is a 2d picture, however OP asked about the girls themselves, not his 2d picture of them.

>And yet it's impossible to not have a figure that travels two dimensionally on a two dimensional medium.
Which is why we accept their depictions as generally describing an ideal rather than being the thing itself. But you are trying to distract with this excursion from the fact that this very ideal is, in two cases, actually not 1-dimensional.
>however with a curve that traces only one dimension you need only to find the representation of that curve where it's only defined by one dimension
And we would lose information that way. Are you really so stupid that you not notice that? specifically referred to the curve of one girl because it makes up her idenitity to him.
>Had he posted 2dpd, post 3d waifus here and attached a picture of a 3d girl, we wouldn't be having this argument
Had you read my original post, you would know that we would be having an argument right now, because I said that anime girls are 2D only insofar as they are 2D representations of 3D bodies, and only stylistically simplified for a variety of reasons.
> a width to the curves as a natural consequence of being on a 2d medium.
Again with the distractions, you dishonest little shit.
The CURVES are quite intentional, and not merely the consequence of the medium.
This will be my last reply, since apparently you are not willing to engage me in an honest argument.

>there is no way to define them as one dimensional figures without losing information
Oh?

The age old debate. Personally Blue is much better than Red. Some people will say Blue is emotionless but they're clearly ignoring a lot of scenes. Red however is too angry for my tastes

Attached: Evangelion.png (600x600, 12.81K)

Is your waifu analytically diffeomorphic to a projective space user?

Attached: 1307472070394.png (914x900, 54.18K)

What a funnily-shaped twig. It's cute.

>his waifu still conforms to euclidean geometry

Attached: 1584322752133.jpg (530x531, 49.18K)

>his waifu has a lebesgue measure bigger than zero

1D? I LOVE ONE DIRECTION TOO OMG!

>his waifu doesn't have a Cartan-Eilenberg resolution

Attached: Aobakek.jpg (1080x1183, 368.48K)

What a fucking retarded argument.
Take the nearest Coke can. Its form is a cylindrical 3D.
Consider only the surface of the cylinder (not the circle parts at each end): it's a 2D plane that curves in 3D. But it's still fucking 2D because it has no depth (and more mathematically any point on its surface can be defined by only two coordinates).
Take now any line on this 2D plane, like the line that coincides both with this cylindrical place and one circular end of the can. It draws a fucking circle in 2D but it still is one dimensional (and without limit, I might add, which is totally irrelevant here).
If you don't understand this Coke geometry you really are retarded.

>bunch of NEETs pretend they actually know anything beyond not coloring outside the lines

I was thinking the same thing. I had the impression you were going to engage me seriously, but you seem to just be misrepresenting my argument and flinging shit out of anger. Unfortunate, because I saw you as someone capable of holding a rational discussion

And funny