Just lost $8000 on a failed trade

just lost $8000 on a failed trade

Attached: pepe.jpg (249x217, 6.25K)

Nice. I lost $44,000 on margin yesterday.

now you are prepared to make three or four times as much on a succesful trade. welcome to hell OP

Do you guys realize that for every time someone wins, another person has to lose on the other end? We can't all be winners. And if someone wins BIG, many other people have to lose for it to happen. This is built in the very concept of competition.

Fuck.

Attached: 1592647263869.jpg (500x491, 35.63K)

In my village $8,000 you made it

based

that's literally how life works
sheep has to kill grass to survive and wolf has to eat sheep to survive
i need to eat normies to survive

based

Nope

That's the idea, but how are you so sure that you aren't a sheep for a bigger wolf?
Enlighten my darkness then. How can we all win?

Not true. Anyone can buy chainlink and hodl and win. Their greed, ignorance, and shortsightedness thwarts them, however

normies are the grass i'm the sheep but sometimes sheep like me get eaten by wolf aka whales and exchanges

do you realize the more people who buy in makes everyone else richer?

and there is no way to be safe from wolfs aside from using small leverages

Not true.
I buy LINK at $8.
Alice buys from me at $1000.
Bob buys from Alice at $2000.
Bob stakes his LINK and makes money.
There are no losers.

Yes, and it makes everyone else who didn't buy in less richer. Honestly I expected more from Zig Forums, though at least this user is quite redpilled.

You realize if your wet dream pajeet fantasy comes true, you still need to sell your link at $1000 to someone buying the top, right Prakesh?

you are not rich until you cash out. Therefore, buying in doesn't make anyone rich.

>he thinks its a meme

because it's not trading it's gambling you degenerate mungus

Based.
>you had 2 years

Notice an implication of this meme? The supposition is that the wolves priced in and anyone who buys now is a normie buying the top

Doesnt change the argument. In this hypothetical, some poor loser is still BUYING a $1000 trade. Even hodlers are taking money from someone making a dumb investment at some point. It's the nature of markets. Dog eat dog

Why do I fuck sheep then? I don't get it.

Is it a loss if it goes to 1050?

no no no
the real wolf is sergay and whoever manipulated binance to buy at 0.0001 cent
we sheep who bought at 30 cent or less but still sheep, our grass are all the normalfags who bought above one dollar and keep buying at 8 lmao

Yep. I hate the pretentiousness of 99% of Zig Forums pretending they give a quarter of a fuck about all these "projects". They bought something for a price, they want the price to go up, and they want to dump their bags on some poor bozo who will FOMO in at the priced in investment.

>sergey bought a couple million link for $200

This is still unbelievable

Nobody is pretending wanting anything but money, this isn't reddit

I mean if I buy amazon, Walmart or apple stocks, maybe I can get an 8% return at the end of the year if I'm lucky? Point being priced in assets dont provide very substantial returns

But its not a loss. Its not a huge amount of roi but its not a loss.

Moonboys often pretend their specific asset will alter the future and change the world. I dont mind people being honest and just wanting a sick return, but there's certainly a degree of hostility towards day traders that's very hypocritical from these people. They want to make some dosh at the expense of others and pretend they wont inevitably dump on someone at the top in their arbitrarily defined timeline

Meant for

Time to take an economics 101 lesson.

Trading is not a zero sum game.

only if you believe in unlimited growth
everybody would win at bitcoin if the price would just keep going up to new ath with no limit
but this isn't the case

>trading
NGMI

Attached: 1590444857850.png (1200x1057, 2.2M)