Is $10 LINK even mathematically possible?

Is $10 LINK even mathematically possible?

Attached: 1594558085732.jpg (1000x562, 81.17K)

no

take a gander over at the graph and you tell me

This whole thing is crazy. I thought the white paper said LINK shouldn't rise over $1. Were they lying?

it never said that, the coffee cup meme was just a meme

No sell for 7.0p and fill my buy order

Attached: 1589073742732.png (600x580, 359.62K)

Do you know how high the market cap would need to be for $10 link? You're delusional, get yourself to the infirmary.

10 dollar coffee is not unheard of

are you kidding? this shit finna pop off to above $15 in just a couple days.

These in my town they sell blue mountains coffee for 15 dollars a cup

Let's see for how long this fat Russian fuck can manipulate and artificially pump the price.
My bet is $12 is the limit.

Scientifically impossible due to the fundamentals of combining mixicles with smart contracts. We are now a $9.60 stablecoin.

It was $9.75 an hour ago

Attached: 1586899160423s.jpg (250x140, 4.27K)

I expect the price of a cup of coffe to rise significantly in the coming weeks

Theoretically anything is possible. Theoretically we're all made of cheese.

>He sold $1000+ tokens for network utilization for a cup of coffee
NGMI

Damn LINK will only go to $100 apparently. Sad

Attached: E02A433D-49F8-4791-9CD9-87905FD719DA.jpg (750x520, 208.18K)

LINK NEEDS TO STOP MOONING, ITS CAUSING MY MORNING COFFEE AT STARKEKS TO BECOME TOO FUCKING EXPENSIVE I CAN'T AFFORD TEN GODDAMN DOLLARS FOR A CUP OF MORNING BEFORE WORK EVERY DAY

Attached: sjw reee.jpg (960x540, 45.45K)

Coffee in America is $7 user. When people say cup of coffee in America they are taking about millennial $7 coffee, not boomer $1 trash.

Mathematically, no it is not... I am a seasoned dev and cryptography enthusiast and what is apparent to me looking at the code for Chainlink is that Sergey et al. did not account for a rise to double-digit price in $. Simply put, the cryptographic integrity of Chainlink's protocol would be compromised due to a bug in the code that will execute if the price breaches $10. It's similar to the Y2K scare with business-oriented accounting software, except this is real.

When this comes out I expect the price to drop about 50-75% and my group has shorts in place should we break that $10 threshold and the truth about this bug comes out. In truth, I fully expect the 700k dumps to start coming in once we are around the $9.90 level to drive price back down and suppress the truth about this oversight.

Plan accordingly as this will be the only "heads up" I suspect you will get on the matter.

Peace.

Sloppy Job Simeon!

Attached: butthead.jpg (1310x890, 192.13K)

FUD

That wasn't in the whitepaper and you're retarded for believing it.

any minute now

Are you fucking retarded?

Thanks for confirming user. All makes sense. Glad to see my gut feeling was right on this one

I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons. I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. Zig Forums hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit.

Also glad I went with my intuition on this one. Not a single user of chain link is a major factor, to me.
Traded all my stinkers for xrp. Time will tell if that was the right decision..

What projects do you believe will have significant real world use?