Ethereum is rising.
Ethereum is rising
Checked
All in eth or stay poor
$500 by end of august, i dare you to screenshot this btcmaxi scum.
comfy with my life savings invested in picrelated
Imagine not having your life savings in ETH right now.
I believe in eth as much as anyone, but you faggots start to sound like desperate pajeets
If how hard Vitalik BTFOd Beck didn't give you at least a half chub I don't know what to tell you bud.
Cope
I'm all in LINK
Don't get me wrong, Vitty is based and he is right.
But seeing Zig Forums go 100X GUARANTEED SIRS SELL EVERYTHING AND BUY ETH SIRS is not a good sign. It's like looking at literally any shitcoin thread right now.
>Vitalik
yup
based vitals btfo satoshi larp
Imagine not having a diversified portfolio including ETH.
Fucking maxis are retards.
>he fell for the diversification meme
Nobody tell him.
Eth has been suppressed for a long time, you don't want to be holding alts when Eth skyrockets.
It's only BECAUSE of alts that I've been able to stack 200 ETH over the past few months.
Kill yourselves. Today.
Stfu poorfag. Christ you larping retards are insufferable.
adam back is satoshi, which was a dissapointment to me. The last nail in the coffin for me was when he shared so quickly on his twitter the "user OG miner and Hodler" post saying Craig Wright was a fraud.
That Old piece of shit still fight for bitcoin, when In reality nobody can deny how shit that coin is. Almost everyone other coin gives more value than that slow ass technology.
Fuck Adam and Fuck btc.
checked
btw, by coffin i meant, that the old miner was satoshi which was adam.
He kept mining for years and years.
He has more btc than anyone could imagine
vitalik is nothing more than a guru reading tea leaves. eth is only rising because bitcoin is rising.
the ETHBTC chart would disagree with you
i guarantee you this was painted by a 32ETH node operator
god this reeks of reddit
I believe in vitalik but I believe more in satoshi
My life savings are 80% btc and 20% eth
he didn't say july
>adam
I remember for a long time the Satoshi Nakamoto article on Wikipedia had an edit war where people were trying to put his name as one of the possible candidates, with a bunch of people saying the evidence wasn't substantial enough. This was on the same page that listed Creg as a possible candidate. They're also refusing to let Chainlink have an article even though there are other shitcoins that get to have one. What's going on with Wikipedia?
hmmm
>CMC
>24h % change
I see
carry on then
Where can I buy a copy of this? I want it hanging on my wall.
Someone explain (((blockstream))) to me
Checked.
>The tides of history will not be favorable to maximalism.
love this autist like you wouldn't believe
Satoshi fears the money skelly
diversification is only a meme when it ends up meaning having like a couple hundred bucks max in dozens of different shitcoins. We're talking about healthy diversification here, like a portfolio mainly consisting of BTC/ETH/LINK
sounds like money skelly is smoking too much mETH
It's (((their))) attempt at parasitizing Bitcoin and LN for the benefit of special interest groups.
Thankfully we have based XSN and X9 devs saving lightning network
I've thought about this as well. Wiki will have articles for obscure indie artists and whatever the fuck other irrelevant garbage, but cryptocurrencies and blockchain tech with marketcaps in the billions don't warrant an article? Doesn't make any sense at all.
But how exactly? I've never quite understood what blockstream is, only that it gave me a really bad gut feeling
$2,000-$4,000 conservatively, by the end of year.