ITT: the "villain" actually makes a good point

ITT: the "villain" actually makes a good point.

Attached: 20-29abb8999dfe8e72303fdbade6fa4f35a8da7cb309b6f0f9071c94c8af5700c5.png (836x1200, 742.96K)

Pic not related

>30 year old teacher grooming a 16 year old boy.
That's a crime, even in Nipponland. Chad teacher was correct.

>villain makes a good point
>"Yeah, I don't recall asking for your evil opinion"
>beats up villain anyway

Metal Knight

This. If you allow it to happen the boy might go on to become the President of France.

Attached: 1602227638452.png (800x154, 19.16K)

>a point is made even if from the evil side
>the characters ignore it simply because the character is evil
Most manga already does this

Attached: 010.jpg (2133x1600, 302.68K)

I want the MC to agree but still not care and beat them up

Hardly, the most problematic thing about their relationship is the fact she is his teacher. The ML is well within the age of consent not to mention their relationship isn't even sexual. hell, she isn't even willing to kiss him until he's 20 years old. the other teacher is only really doing it because he himself is interested in sensei, not out of any professional interest. it's why instead of discussing it with a colleague like a normal person, he decided to go after the teenager in question, which is a cheap move more designed to remove a rival than any sort of altruism

>That's a crime
They are literally not doing anything against the rules
>Chad teacher was correct.
Correct about what? They aren't doing anything wrong and he intruded without knowing anything

based

God what a dick

It's interesting to see a manga take a more realistic approach to an age-difference romance like this, whether it was for the better is left unanswered for now.

Attached: 1600199795091.png (780x463, 130.15K)

Most """villains""" from Bleach.

post tits

What a fucking arrogant retard.
Too bad teens around here think this is alpha behavior.

This is how all heroes should function.

Attached: 1446831020670.jpg (571x411, 82.65K)

This seems like a good way to get a wife who inevitably ends up cheating on you.

all 100% correct

Attached: x17.png (1128x1600, 566.27K)

Based
Go back

"Chad" teacher was just jealous he was 15 years past his prime.

People do this in real life a lot but not as blunt and straight faced as this guy. Sometime it works sometime it doesnt. Women should be grateful that they have the easier life thou.

It's like with the Unabomber. If you read his manifesto "Industrial Society and Its Future" he actually has some interesting points, but also mailed bombs that maimed and killed people. The cackling villain standing on a pile of corpses making some maybe-valid philosophical point is still a horrible murderer and needs to be taken down.

>villain makes good point
>mc dabs on villain with even better point that absolutely destroys the villain:s "good point"
>starts doing double backflips

>villain makes a point
>not a good one, just a point
>doesn’t back it up or prove anything
>his actions, which are unarguably evil, have little to do with the point he made
>retards defend him to this day
What’s his name, Zig Forums?

you never heard the ideas of the guys saying the same thing that didn't send letter bombs to people. he thought it imperative to get his message out, considering the conduct of the alphabet agencies and their false flags and wet workers is he in the wrong?

Literally every Naruto villain aside from based Orochimaru

>you never heard the ideas of the guys saying the same thing that didn't send letter bombs to people.

Of course we did. He articulated some good points, but wasn't breaking new ground in his critique of modern industrial society. Plenty of scholars and environmental thinkers had been saying and writing about similar things for decades (e.g., Bill McKibben), both academically and in popular books. Kaczynski could have joined that conversation.

>he thought it imperative to get his message out, considering the conduct of the alphabet agencies and their false flags and wet workers is he in the wrong?

Yes. Blowing up random airport workers and professors served literally no purpose, and certainly didn't add to or advance the conversation he wanted people to have. What did help advance environmental causes were non-murderer activists and movements influencing public opinion and legislation.

That's what they also do. Do you read at all?

How many people actually know or care about his idead, though? Even if he had a point, the shit he did ensured that his ideas would get overshadowed and tainted by the crimes he commited to spread them.
Same thing as that one autistic Zig Forumstard who shot up some mosques a couple months ago. Dude also had some big, gay manifesto he wanted people to learn about but of course no one gave a shit and only focused on the shootings.