Which is better?
Part 3
>Better cast
>Better story
>Better adventure
Part 4
>Better villain
>Better fights
>Better stands
Which is better?
Part 3
>Better cast
>Better story
>Better adventure
Part 4
>Better villain
>Better fights
>Better stands
The answer is part 5
>worst JoJo
>weaker villain
>worst ending
>best supporting cast
>great stands
>great story
>great minor villains
Yeah seems alright
Part 4. More fun, more colourful, I prefer the characters and less drawn out.
Second half of Part 3 > Part 4 > First half of Part 3.
Imo Part 7> Part 4 > Part 2 > Part 3 > Part 1(Grows into being great) > Part 5(Starts off a Mary Sue)
Not sure where to put part 6
Though on part 4.
Make Yoshikage a threat from the beginning lol, the only person of significance we saw him kill off was a literal retard. A part with a serial killer who ends up accomplishing nothing, what a waste of time.
Part 4 has an objectively better cast aside from Shigechi and the story is actually interesting instead of just being villain of the week.
Part 3 is pure adventure though and has a very good antagonist, but that's about it.
Part 5's still better than both (because it's just part 3 but not shitty and not slice of life like part 4) and Part 7 is better than everything listed prior.
4 is better, but 3 is a better adaption of its manga than 4's is aside from a few decisions like skipping the sidewalk driving scene.
>the only person of significance we saw him kill off was a literal retard
nevermind Hayato's father, Reimi, Cinderella girl, or anyone else that was discussed as him murdering and getting away with as he was a fucking non-in your face serial killer and all you needed to see was his psychosis once to get the message. The less it was shown the better it was because that was his entire point you retard.
>best supporting cast
Lol no
yawn
>one has DIO
>the other doesn't
Part 3 gods win again
fag tier opinion
>great minor villains
You mean Cioccolata and Secco, right? If so, yes. La Squadra is pure dog shit.
>yawning is an opinion
snore
I think part 4 had a better cast but part 3 utilized the cast better if that makes sense. But the two were going for two sperate atmospheres and goals. I think a part3 vs part5 discussion would have more merit.
Part 3 has the better JoJo
>Hayato's father, Reimi, Cinderella girl,
Nobodies.
He was ineffective and incompetent. His only rememberable value is being a meme about hands. He failed at his goal of being a real threat because of plot armor and bad writing.
This
How do you like part 4 when you hate the only good thing about it?
>hate the only good thing about it?
>Josuke
>Koichi's moments
>Rohan's autism
>Jotaro's autism
>Josuke's personality and autism
>Good setting
>Great humor
>Fun antagonists
>Most amusing part after part 2
Just saying one antagonist sucked kek.
Making him have a totally unmentioned and unhinted at affair years before part 3 just so that they could make Josuke related to him was contrived and out of character, change my mind
part 5:
cons:
>boring side characters/jobros (except bruno and mista)
> some stands are ugly and/or boring
>most boring villain( diavolo) and worst character in the whole series (doppio)
>completely destroyed Polnareff as a character
pros:
< most of the fights are really good
< many stands are pretty cool and interesting
pro or con depending on the person
>giorno is jotaro 2
>and worst character in the whole series (doppio)
say that to my alternate personality not my main fucker see what happens
This is why part 4 is non-canon in my mind.
Anybody watched the rohan OVAS? they're pretty good
Holly totally deserved to be cheated on though. She had one job, after all.
joseph cheating on his wife is the most joseph thing ever, we could also add that he banged a college student as a 50-60 y/o as a way to cope for becoming old and feeling young again, that's something joseph would totally do
based
Part 2