Jojo

Is Phantom Blood really that bad?
I just completed reading part 1 and I personally felt the first half was meh but I really liked the ending. The point being that every one I have talked has said that I would need to bear with part 1 as if there is nothing good going for it.

Attached: end.png (1400x1100, 348.11K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/eR-S5OO9A9o
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

it's the best of jojo.

for a sec i though this was first of the north star
no wonder nobody likes part 1 its a shameless ripoff

Part 1 has boring fights and a supporting cast that barely exists, but the relationship between Jonathan and Dio carries it. The ending was also a surprise and no other part ever attempts to do anything similar aside from Part 6.

Jonathan vs Dio is unironically still one of the best fights in the series
The rest of it is just Castlevania x Hokuto no Ken, it's alright

part 5 is worst since it doesn't connect to any other parts yet, but i liked the adaptation tho

Attached: 1601762219320.jpg (865x1390, 109.17K)

No taste does this one have

There isn't a bad part of jojo

3 is objectively bad

This. The opening chapters are the peak of Jojo.

>There isn't a bad part of jojo

I have a weird relationship with the anime/manga. There a number of parts I feel bleh about, but every part at least has a little something I enjoy.

It's alright just that every other Jojo after it is much better. Speedwagon was great, excellent Johnathan and Dio dynamic, Tarkus vs Jonathan is a good fight. Jack the Ripper felt a little silly though compared to the rest

it's the less bizarre

It's not so much that it's bad, it's just that it's fairly tame early Heisei action shonen. It's nowhere near as bizarre as the rest of Jojos' adventures, so it looks boring in comparison.

Attached: 1599696974954.jpg (756x1203, 52.11K)

Anyone claiming that [part X] of Jojo is bad is likely a retard.

third post best post

Chads

>Is Phantom Blood really that bad?
It is literally so bad that even Araki said he considers it the worst Jojo and that he doesn't even recognize it as his work anymore.

Only contrarian redditors like this guy pretend that it's good.

BASED

>best premise
>best villain
>best jobro
>best ending

That's because all the people who told you that are anime only fags. The anime for part 1 sucks compared to the manga

>best premise
SBR
>best villain
SBR
>best jobro
SBR
>best ending
SBR

The story of Jonathan and Dio is pretty awesome. I like Phantom Blood. I prefer Battle Tendency and DiU, but it’s a great tone setter.

Back to twitter with you

>SBR
>DIO
>Bucciarati
>Battle Tendency

only good one other than 8 at this point

Only Part 1 and 7 are good.

Enter best theme
youtu.be/eR-S5OO9A9o

Easily the best "main theme" of a part.

I didn't like jojo until the second half of part 4, started loving it then
before that it was kind of a chore to go through, hated part 3 so much I dropped it for a few years but since part 6 it's been some of my favorite manga ever

This. This part is underrated because there wasn't no Stands or bullishit halfway through it, but Jojo and Dio relationship was actually a good rivalry.

The deeper I got into jojo, the more I appreciated part 1.

Part 1 is my favorite part, it has that gothic horror theme that i like over the more shonen shit that comes after

It's everyone's favorite until they see the rest.