2017fag here with some protips to newfags

2017fag here with some protips to newfags.
If your chart looks like this, you should probably sell. Congrats on the win.

Attached: 2017.png (722x463, 13.74K)

2017 was the year of the gay

it looked like this in august fool. then moondicked harder than anything anyone had ever seen.

thanks. any other protips?

Sure. if you hit a 10x or 5x like pic related, just cash out a portion like 60% or so. Let the rest fly in case of further mooning. At that point you literally have nothing to worry about.

2016fag here, if your chart looks like this you should probably sell, congrats on the win.

Attached: ETH2016.jpg (313x161, 5.36K)

what's the best strategy on maxing gainz? how do i pick the coins? how many coins should i be in? and is defi going to lead this bullrun?

>tell me how to predict the future
die newfag

>zoom in

Losing out on gains is worse than bagholding a dump

Ah yes, the DBC strategy.

you should go back to website, norman

Sometimes you baghold a dump on that logic and it never comes back. You're just left bagholding while 98% of your gains evaporate and eventually the devs fuck off because they already made it and don't really need to work on it anymore.

People know it's coming down, right? It's a pump from newfags flooding in but has no further buy support to deviate from the mean. Even people who sold ETH at $100 because it went way above the mean were eventually able to buy back in for lower than their buy-in.

Attached: new paradigm.png (1215x476, 83.33K)

I'd agree if we were talking your typical shitcoin. But I trust fundamental analysis over technical analysis any day, especially long-term. I haven't FOMO'd any in a long time so even a steep drop isn't something I'm losing sleep over

what do you anticipate it going down to?

>You're just left bagholding while 98% of your gains evaporate and eventually the devs fuck off because they already made it and don't really need to work on it anymore.
Many such cases, sad.

>were eventually able to buy back in for lower than their buy-in.
But did they? Most didn't.

TA isn't important on link in the long run

Its not geared for some retail investors with 400 rupees

Its geared for big business with billions. Only the fundamentals matter. If it dips down to 20 cents again I don't give a FUCK I am never selling you fucking kike in fact even if link is a fucking scam and it drops to 0 I'll buy more I'll buy all the bags and rope so no kike can get a single stinky link

Bro sergey literally wears the same shirt every fucking day. You think he cares about the money?

Guess it matters if you're in a chink buzzword scam at the peak of normie bliss vs a decent project that's almost certainly going to go higher after a pullback

It's going down to the mean - the green line that nothing has ever long-term deviated from. That might be $9 if it dumps hard, $10 if it dumps slow. LINK is currently in a bubble, and will be worth these prices in a few months, but definitely not now, when it's just cheap money and hopium.

I bought Kleros in January. A 10k investment went from that to 40k to 9k to 130k (today) to 112k as of right now. I don’t even know what to do. The chart looks ridiculous. It has to correct. And hard. But does it, really? I wasn’t planning on selling any before a Coinbase listing. I also bought ETH at $13 and have been holding ever since. One would think I’d learn to take profits by now. Fuck, man.

Attached: E15C772F-6AB9-48C6-B8BF-D1042BB96034.png (600x497, 7.97K)

>But does it, really?
Yes, it does. That's what I'm trying to tell you guys. I was in your shoes in 2017 and watched my bags drop by over 95% because I /knew/ it was going to recover. It didn't.

Does this apply if you own AAPL?

Attached: 41442745-14D7-45AB-ABC9-9C231B17275C.png (1242x2688, 1.13M)

It applies to more than just LINK - but anyone can get bored. If Sergey doesn't have staff to turn over to, and if there are no funds to pay those staff, there's always the chance it gets abandoned two years into the next crash.

they think it just goes up forever. let em learn op, let em learn

No because they generate hundreds of billions in revenue per year.

Does this apply if you own AMZN?

Attached: 65B5EC56-11D1-42A8-9C14-7C4D5C744679.png (1242x2688, 1.09M)

god tier cup and handle formation. Im gonna coooom

Are you comparing multi-trillion dollar tech titans to NEET judge courts? You should probably sell while you're ahead.

dr;ns

So multi-trillion dollar tech giants are fundamentally vertical. Forever? I guess my point is..is that if you chose the true winners in the Blockchain and DeFi world, they too would become fundamentally vertical, long-term.

Attached: 10A7DD96-F8A7-45CA-AAB4-5291776C7EC0.jpg (2371x688, 146.06K)

Pic related for the newbies. Guess how people were feeling about their "investments" right at the tippy top. Pretty damn great, I can tell you that much. New paradigm, holding till I'm a millilonaire, etc.

Attached: 2017part2.png (414x340, 10.26K)