Crypto doesn't have a real life use case

UOS/Ultra

PC game distribution system similar to steam with use of UOS crypto. Solid partnerships with UBisoft and AMD. Releases at the end of the year

Currently mooning.

Why don’t you look into subjective vs objective data first, before spewing shit from your mouth.
Pro tip: link CANNOT automate subjectivity

See you at $.5 EOM

>pink ID
>fuds pnk
Yep, checks out. Kek loves to toy with faggots like you. You’ve probably never even heard of 4MOONXGG either topkek

Not to mention Kleros is one of the largest holds among top 5k link wallets. (yes, it’s been adjusted for big exchange wallets) Read em and seethe kek

Attached: 2905B4E2-8363-490A-AEF5-12E94CDF570C.jpg (1372x606, 104.51K)

You think we are here because we actually care about crypto? ngmi

He literally just did that you retard.
Go back soiboi

Okay Kys samefag. You can spend all day fudding like the bitch you are. Pnk has done a 20x since February and will continue to climb. I’ll be back to remind you how much of a faggot your are Kek.

Literal retard makes no sense. Congrats on this one user! You’re doing great HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA hahahaha

Attached: 3A84C706-97BC-4CFC-BDAE-225E7006CA25.jpg (1536x2048, 318.94K)

That site pax is a scam

Attached: D836E704-F34D-410A-B83A-46ECCC449706.jpg (684x576, 88.87K)

not released yet

you can buy stuff with real money and you can transfer said money anywhere in the world

still not a single complete project that isn't a scam. can we agree that crypto is a way to transfer wealth from the idiots to the smart ones?

>Crypto doesn't have a real life use case
this, but unironically

Only the very poor and the very rich really "get" the financial use cases.
Remittances is a real issue with a ton of financial graft. It's not just "use fiat" because transaction and forex fees from every WU transaction massively add up for the people who are using these services most.
For digital purchases, sure, you can "use fiat" but the people who actually own companies who run a lot of payments understand economies of scale. They therefore know that 2.5-3% a year in fees, before getting into baseline costs of Stripe/PayPal integrations, adds up massively over time.

transferwise already solved the fee problem.

>transferwise
You pay 1%, wait at least 24 hours, and have to go through a bank.
There are at least three things in that sentence that are solved by emerging PoS blockchains.
Pair that with a trustless value stabilizing system (could be a stablecoin, could be something else) and good UI/integrations and you eliminate both.
There will always be a place for fiat gateways, particularly for systems in which refundable purchase, fraud detection, credit, etc etc are a concern. It seems a bit silly to me to pretend remittances and a wide variety of digital payments can't be improved upon though.

fine, that is one problem. Which could be solved by a single crypto currency project.
what about the other billions of projects out there?

Transferring fiat from one country to another is a huge pain in the ass. You know nothing

Haha i love watching clowns get emotional and irate over their chosen coin when asked to defend it. Keep going.

How about not being a banks bitch for the first time since you opened your first checking account?

taxes
cash out through trusted local dealer only for expenses

>calling me bank's bitch
>calculates the value of his funny internet coin in USD which is cucked by banks to hell and back.

Easy, XRP
Fucking complete and tested in real life enviroment.

Are you asking me to defend the entire cryptocurrency space? 99.99% of crypto projects are memecoins and scams that will die.
My point is that "remittances" and "digital payments" is a bigger problem than buying drugs anonymously (which is already basically solved by Monero).
Hence there's an argument to be made for speculating on technologies you think could be a viable candidate. RSR/RSV, Celo, ONE, ADA, ETH (2.0)... etc.
The reason this board was so (correctly) bullish on LINK is because it did a really good job of solving a problem that is essential to any of this stuff taking off. But the coins that make use of it are still an open question.
In the meantime you can make a pretty penny throwing dumb money at memecoins. Pretty much all of this DeFi stuff is going to crash hard and is only valuable for gambling.

plenty of operational trading platforms that serve the crypto space, as well as a number of gambling apps and gaming platforms with a functional product, decent daily volume, and user base.

cheap remittance is definitely a use case, but there's also a core level of liquidity and velocity required to compare to existing fiat standards. crypto is definitely faster, and can be cheaper, but it's still in it's infancy and as a result very volatile, which is in some ways preventing adoption of real life use cases.

stable coins help resolve some of that volatility, but realistically a large use case for crypto right now is trading, which feeds on that volatility.

limited market wide liquidity, plus high levels of volatility, plus semi-anonymity, is all a recipe for volatility, as many coins are fed purely on speculation.

don't make the mistake of thinking 'many' means 'all', though. there's good work being done in crypto and it's contributing to both the finance industry as well as many others.