Why didn't he just kill the politicians and lawyers that are soft on criminals
Why didn't he just kill the politicians and lawyers that are soft on criminals
Becaus nips are priviliged first worlders who have no idea how the world works.
Because hes a spoiled brat who thinks crimanal=bad instantly and never thought that people may be committing crime because of economic reasons and also never even thought to make up his own list of laws and things that are criminal enough to deserve death
Light should've namedropped (((them)))
because he was a 17yo kid with an immature understanding of the world, something L pointed out early
Because
1. He’s immature and retarded.
2. Crime doesn’t magically stop because you start killing criminals. In ancient times they did but I seriously doubt they had a lower crime rate Than even places like brazil.
even as a 17 year old I knew (((who))) was responsible for the evil in the world, and Light is supposedly a genius.
Ok Zig Forums, you get the Death Note, what are the first 3 names you write?
>Benjamin Netenyahu
>Bashar Al-Assad
>Amy Schumer.
Why would he kill non-criminals instead of criminals?
they didnt have jews in japan at the time
Perhaps next time don't watch anime at x2.0 speed you speedwatcher caveman
>Politicians
> Innocent
You think so?
That would really motivate the glows to kill his ass.
>Me
>
>
>committing crime because of economic reasons
Weird, I never read about shitty genes, terrible parents, or retarded culture in any of my Economics textbooks
>hurr durr all politicians are corrupt
Why didn't he just kill the criminals' families?
You could write "Hilary Clinton calls press conference, confesses evrything she knwos about epstein, strips butt naked and swallows cynaide pill"
I never implied that all of them are corrupt .
>people may be committing crime because of economic reasons
Committing a crime is committing a crime, regardless of the reason behind it. Cope harder.
>October 30th, 1517: Martin Luther dies before he can finish his heretical 95 theses
How about you go for the corrupt politicians, war criminals and genocidal dicatators first instead of killing man who stole 200$ ?
/thread
Thats pretty much my point, thats possibly what light would say because hes a spoiled brat with a 1 dimensional view of how the world works
Ignoring that he's just a power tripping cunt who made up a goal that sounds justified on paper, killing Lawyers and Politicians doesn't make people afraid to commit crimes, best case scenario he's just filling up more prisons and since he killed Prisoners he obviously doesn't think that's a worthwhile punishment.
The Kira angle is meant to give the illusion/play the role of a wrathful God that will punish you for your crimes, Light doesn't care about trying to remove actors to change the system to be harsher on criminals. He wants to destroy the system and place himself as God.
>Pope proclaims rey ayanami best girl for all eternity, 3 days later dies peacefully in his bed.
If I was in Light's position, I would. He's portrayed as a genius but he's really not, as you just pointed out. There are people who actually deserve death compared to a man who stole $200
Stealing has been considered a crime ever since the first law codes. You can call him a spoiled brat or whatever but he's right. Crime=bad instantly. Do I think a person who steals deserves to die? No. But saying there are justifications for crimes makes you an enabler.
You’re literally proving his point retard. It’s been proven certain factors increase the likelihood of someone commuting a crime. But instead of targeting those and massive reducing crime effectively you would rather do a policy that has been proven to do Jack shit to actually lower crime and be as vindictive as possible towards people that commit crime.
It’s childish and shows you are actually brain dead.
>Series set in 2006
>Doesn't go after al-qaeda
>Doesn't try to stop the Iraq war.
So lame !
>and be as vindictive as possible towards people that commit crime.
Nothing wrong with that. Fear of crime can prevent crimes.
*Fear of committing a crime
They had politicians
In multiple countries they did this. Like the Soviet Union. But guess what it did Jack shit to stop crime.
In Maoist China they did this as well and guess what, it did Jack shit to reduce crime.
A good example of this is the one child policy. In China a ton of people were able to avoid it because
1. It’s too hard to actually enforce
2. Ideologically many of the people paid to enforce barely agreed with it. Many saw it was unfair to force someone to stop having kids when they only had a girl and no way to spread the family name so they looked the other way unless they had a son and that’s jsut one example.
Being strict on punishment doesn’t actually deter a crime per se. it just forces it to be a black market unless you go full isolationist like North Korea and brainwash the populace into a cult or something.
>>hurr durr all politicians are corrupt
Yeah they are
Yeah, because that's sociology numbnuts. College econ these days has very little to do with actual economics that have to do with humans.
Nice argument.
I don’t write anything because I’m a good Christian. Instead I give the death note to someone who is willing to kill every politician in the world
Why Light is so cute
If you were a good Christian you'd realize you'd be just as guilty as the someone who killed every politician via the death note. The absolute state.
Faggot
>Zig Forumstard is a phoneposting isekaifag
Color me surprised.
>everyone I don’t agree with is a Zig Forumstard
Cope
Yes
Trying to control the world by using the fear of divine punishment to bend people to your will doesn't work with people who already have devout, unbending faith in their own religion. Mujahideen suicide bombers or ISIS soldiers wouldn't give a shit about Kira.
t. blm rioter
>has nothing to do with humans
This is factually incorrect. I’m in college econ courses. We regularly have to bring up humans.