Character motivation is save people because they are weak and weak people need saving

>character agonizes over survivor's guilt

Attached: 1594297888730.png (316x316, 122.92K)

strong guy will use his op powers to help weak people grow. so they are strong too. it's that easy.

That's not human nature.
They will live their lives waiting for the strong guy to help them. They won't get stronger because they have him.

>human nature
Trash argument.

No, strong guy uses his powers for himself and motivate weak people to get strong and be like him.

Attached: who are you quoting.png (300x300, 10.49K)

This trope is shit when the character gets all the girls and the title of god, things just become power fantasy isekai.
It's fucking legendary when the character risks his life over and over to do it just because he wants to save people and still gets seen as a soldier for doing it.

>character mistakenly believes his self-sacrifice to help others is born out of altruism but comes to realize at some point that he's just a fight maniacal and adrenaline addict

source?

>muh social determinism
fuck outta here boy. it's so easy to be jaded and cynical, it's the ultimate cope. it's so easy to be dismissive and not hope for anything. it's so easy to have no faith in people. bitch.

You know I'm right. It's like welfare. When enabled most people will allow themselves to remain in a certain position out of laziness.

Attached: 1586430181010.jpg (500x357, 14.25K)

tagged the wrong guy, was meant for this

>character motivation is unironically genocide of his own species
super based

Attached: 2342352352.jpg (1000x1416, 306.54K)

I know your arguments are junior high level shit takes.

Why?

>character motivation is get laid
>never changes it despite being forced into many catharsis about human nature, love and friendship
>series ends with him still trying to get laid

you have to be 18 to post here

I really, really like the way you think user

>fate/stay night in a nutshell

This is objectively true.
Here, I will use an example.

Why do you think fatherless households in the United States have risen so dramatically over the past decades?
They have the highest percent of children living in single parent households.
It is because the US government had begun subsidizing single mothers. They gave money to mothers when fathers were absent, which encouraged their absence.
They went from 8% of children in single family households in the 60's to nearly a 24.4% in 2012.

This is just how people work. You can't solve a problem by treating the symptoms. You can't help the weak by allowing them to be weak.

>This is objectively true
>Here, I give anecdotal evidence and apologies instead of quantifiable data
Don't you have homework to do, kid? Put down the smartphone.

>mutts
You don't use a mentally ill nation that makes up only 4% of the world's population as an "objective" example of the rest of humanity. Go back to Zig Forums.

These are numbers from official US census bureau.
census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2016/cb16-192.html
I am not sure why you are believing that I am on a smartphone.

Attached: 1477475019002.png (577x660, 338.66K)

>character motivation is drawing yaoi manga

Attached: 1581153981525.gif (500x281, 365.67K)

your point means nothing, the rise in single mother households is due to many many factors, not just the one that suits your view
not to mention that subsidizing single mothers is a US government program because it is quickly becoming impossible to raise children with a single persons income

Noooooo don't undermine the shitposts