What makes a good villain?

What makes a good villain?

Attached: Dio-750x422.jpg (750x422, 38.54K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=9zjLom_HImo
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Being memorable and able to provoke an intense emotional reaction from the audience (like hatred).

Being entertaining
Being competent
Being a contrast to the hero

A villain is good when you feel satisfied when the MC beats the shit out of him.

Attached: no.jpg (842x1200, 249.21K)

FPBP. It's 80% of the point.

Fuck, these are good too.

when you like him more than the MC, like your pic related

Charisma

The ability to be threatening, may it be in an instant or a long build up. If you’re not threatened by a villain they’re an after thought.

Attached: bondrewd.jpg (720x600, 88.34K)

>I only poopoo farted for the goooood of The Abyss

a combination of good aesthetics, attitude and motive

Attached: 1594793677205.png (1320x2008, 1.13M)

realty

what is this from? I tried reverse image searching

Shin Angyo Onshi.

Yeah i would say this more or less is the criteria

I think on top of that its how well the villain executes their own mold, so to speak. Like a villain thats evil just because he is evil can be great, so long as he executes that type of villainy to perfection. Villains that are evil because of apersonal vendetta against the mc like Mahito or Reverse Flash from comics can be good as well, but that is dependent on how much they punish the MC, etc. Then you have villains that are morally grey, call into question efficacy of the characters morality or are idealists like Pain, which again boils down to how well they fit their own mold i.e. do they actually raise legitimate good points about their ideals or are they actually poorly written hypocrites.

If I like them, then they're good villains.
if I don't like then, then they're shit villains. Simple as that.

They are not truly villains.

Being voiced by Norio Wakamoto
youtube.com/watch?v=9zjLom_HImo

Based

Preferably a character that you hate for his actions/beliefs and not how much the author fellate the character.

Attached: 1584536611446.png (572x564, 87.73K)

Sad!

Are they fun to watch like DIO or Frieza? This requirement is all you need to fulfill when they're not deep or more sympathetic with their motivations while piling bodies.

There's no one right answer. If they're entertaining, they're a good villain.

either an answer to the hero or a question that the hero can answer

Villains with depth and sympathetic motivations will always be better than one dimensional shitters like Dio and Frieza.

Attached: happykira.jpg (1280x720, 92.34K)

>he doesn't want to subjugate humanity and live as immortal god emperor of mankind

What are you, a woman?

Nah fuck that. I don't want the author dedicating 80% screentime trying to feel bad about some faggot.

big boobs

Attached: 1604942546836.jpg (1226x2048, 355.02K)

B-b-but what about muh gray morality

This but user forgot the most important ingredient and that's charisma. A villain has to be charismatic and have charm, a dominant personality with a strong ambition. Being ruthless in a cool way is always a plus as well, and a tint of craziness always spices it up.

>being understandable and relatable, without exactly being likeable
>Acts as a foil for the Hero - Who he could have been if he hadn't taken a darker path
>Generally entertaining to watch

logic and morals you agree with but actions you don't. basically put them in a moral grey area.